Force & Motion Homework: Force Diagrams, Velocities & Accelerations

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
Nicholas Egebak
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small box (mass m1) is placed upon a large box (mass m2); the large box i placed on a horizontal table. The boxes begin a rest on the table. The lower box is hit by a horizontal blow at the time t=0 resulting in a initial velocity v0. The frictioncoefficient between all surfaces are µk

Homework Equations


a) Draw force-diagrams for both boxes as the move relative to each other. Indicate all Newtons-Third-Law-Pairs.

b) Determine all velocities and accelerations of the boxes as the move relative to each other. At what time T do the boxes not move relative to each other anymore?

c) Determine the acceleration of the boxes when they do not move relative to each other. What length L do the boxes move in this fase? The initial velocity can be concidered know as v1

The Attempt at a Solution


I started drawing the force diagrams. No problem there. It was easy to see that the normal force in both cases were pairing up with the gravitational force.

For question b) I came up with this equation:
vbox1=v0-a*t​
Applied on the second box (the one underneath the other):

The acceleration must be the kinetic friction force divided by the mass:
vbox1=v0-(fk)/m*t​
Naturally I got:
vbox1=v0k*g*t​

For the box on top:
vbox2=-μk*g*t​

For the acceleration I differentiate both:

abox1=(vbox2)'=-g*µk
abox2=(vbox2)'=-g*µk

It is now that I am lost. I do not know how to find the time by which the boxes are not moving relatively to each other anymore...
Picture of scenario:
Udklip3.png

Force Diagrams:
Udklip2.png

Udklip.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nicholas Egebak said:
I started drawing the force diagrams. No problem there. It was easy to see that the normal force in both cases were pairing up with the gravitational force.
What are fk1 and fk2? The friction forces need more thought here.
Nicholas Egebak said:
Applied on the second box (the one underneath the other):
If you call it box 1, why do you say "second box"? Its acceleration is wrong because you are missing a force acting on it.

For the box on top, be careful with the sign. In which direction will it accelerate?
 
Nicholas Egebak said:
No problem there. It was easy to see that the normal force in both cases were pairing up with the gravitational force.
Careful: The normal force and the gravitational force are not 3rd-law pairs.
 
Doc Al said:
Careful: The normal force and the gravitational force are not 3rd-law pairs.
Oh, yeah! That's right! They are just equal and opposite...
mfb said:
What are fk1 and fk2? The friction forces need more thought here.If you call it box 1, why do you say "second box"? Its acceleration is wrong because you are missing a force acting on it.

For the box on top, be careful with the sign. In which direction will it accelerate?

Do you mean that box 2 has a velocity of 0 at t=0 and it therefore because of the friction will accelerate in the same direction as the velocity of box 1?

I understand that it is a bit confusing when referred to as both box 1 and 'second box' but they are the same

fk1 and fk2 should be the same - I realize that now
 
Nicholas Egebak said:
Do you mean that box 2 has a velocity of 0 at t=0 and it therefore because of the friction will accelerate in the same direction as the velocity of box 1?
For example, yes.

Nicholas Egebak said:
fk1 and fk2 should be the same - I realize that now
They are not, no matter what they represent (which is still undefined).