Force needed to raise a backpack

  • Thread starter Thread starter syllll_213
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Work
Click For Summary
The discussion highlights a misunderstanding regarding the diagram depicting a hiker pulling a backpack with a force at an angle to the vertical, which is labeled incorrectly as a vertical force. It questions the relationship between the force exerted by the hiker on the rope and the tension in the lateral section of the rope. Additionally, it points out the oversight of not considering the contribution from the right half of the rope in the analysis. Clarifying these points is essential for accurately understanding the mechanics involved in raising the backpack. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting forces and tensions in such scenarios.
syllll_213
Messages
17
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
The question is asking how the force needed to raise the pack change, but I am unsure if my working and reasoning is right. Particularly, I am unsure if I can assume both the angles (theta) I labelled to be equivalent because I sort of assumed the force pulled by the guy to be equal to the force pulling on the backpack. Some comment on my working would be appreciated thank you TT.
Relevant Equations
F=ma
IMG_40F4ECC612DA-1.jpeg
IMG_FF319B1E65CA-1.jpeg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The diagram provided seems to have misled you a little. It shows the hiker pulling down at some angle to the vertical but labels a vertical force ##\vec F##.
How does the force with which the hiker pulls on the rope relate to the tension in the lateral section of the rope?

Also, you seem to have forgotten the contribution from the right half of the rope.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
980
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K