Force on a charge inside a hollow charged sphere

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The force on a point charge q1 inside a hollow conductive sphere with charge q2 is determined by applying Gauss's Law, which indicates that the electric field (E) inside the sphere is zero when there is no enclosed charge. However, when q1 is present, the surrounding charge q2 does not influence the internal field, leading to the conclusion that the force on q1 remains zero. The discussion also highlights the relevance of the Paul Trap concept for ion confinement, emphasizing that the internal charge does not produce a force on itself, regardless of the configuration of the surrounding sphere.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law (F=k q1q2/r^2)
  • Familiarity with Gauss's Law and its application to closed surfaces
  • Knowledge of electric fields and their behavior in conductive materials
  • Basic concepts of ion confinement and the Paul Trap mechanism
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of Gauss's Law in electrostatics
  • Explore the principles of the Paul Trap and its applications in atomic measurements
  • Learn about image charges and their role in electrostatic problems
  • Investigate simulations for electric fields and forces in conductive materials
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying electrostatics, electrical engineering, and ion confinement techniques. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of electric fields in conductive spheres and the implications of charge distribution.

mheslep
Gold Member
Messages
373
Reaction score
714

Homework Statement


What is the force on a point charge q1 contained inside a hollow conductive sphere (or fine grid) with charge q2 and radius R?

Homework Equations


Coulomb F=k q1q2/r^2
Gauss Law/method of closed surface: Integral over closed surface of Enormal da = E times the area of the surface = Flux = must equal the enclosed charge / eps0.
F=qE

The Attempt at a Solution



Am aware of familiar prediction that an _empty_ hollow sphere has no internal E field, which follows from applying gauss's law to any virtual surface internal to the sphere with no enclosed charge, therefore E must be zero everywhere. In this case w/ contained q1 there is some field. However, applying gauss's closed surface again seams to give just the solution for E from a point charge q: E=kq1/r^2 (r distance from q1) only, with no E contribution from the surrounding sphere. Thus no force on q1? I've done some computer sim. (2D only) by surrounding a pt charge w/ 2 dozen like pt charges arranged in a circle and then doing N - body Coulomb - there's plenty of resulting force on the internal charge excepting the center of the circle.

A little help please?

Falstaff
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I admire your resourcefulness at trying to simulate the situation with discrete point charges. If you follow that route then you should be able to show that as the number of point charges gets larger and larger then the interior force gets smaller and smaller. In the limit of a continuous distribution it will go to zero. Really!
 
Yes with an _empty_ interior you don't need many circular charges to see the E field approaching zero. With an internal charge, though, the E field can not be zero everywhere. Gauss's law: I can close a surface around a charge, there must be non zero E. For that matter, let the internal pt charge grow a bit to the point where it becomes a smaller sphere so that you then have a concentric sphere capacitor. In that case I know the E between the inner and outer spheres - some ~ constant radial E.
 
Last edited:
The internal charge doesn't produce a force on itself. Or do I misunderstand you?
 
Ah, ok. You're stating there is an E field but only due to the internal charge - a normal pt charge radial E field w/ no contribution from the surrounding sphere, thus no force? Makes sense. What about the concentric spheres case then. Isn't that an example of the same thing?
 
Exactly. But what about the concentric spheres case? I don't quite get the picture?
 
My point: Isnt the concentric spheres case merely an a specific instance of the general case of a charge contained inside a sphere? Ah, (again). I am thinking now that yes it is, but again as before there is no net force on the smaller sphere.

Bottom line is I was trying to tinker w/ the Paul Trap concept and use all positive rotating poles instead of the rotating dipole. Works great in the 2D sim, I am containing 100kev ions no problem.
 
Ah, you are editing your posts! Sure there is E field between the spheres, hence capacitance, but still no force on the internal sphere.
 
Wow, Paul Trap! Guess I'd better look that one up.
 
  • #10
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
Thanks! So this isn't just pure theory.
 
  • #12
Paul Traps have been around for some years apparently. Its ability to hold an ion I believe is the basis for some of our best atomic measurements. I was curious about using something like it to confine at higher densities and energies. The trick is converting the rotating dipole to all positive poles which seems to generate a significant virtual potential well for my 2D sim.
 
  • #13
mheslep said:

Homework Statement


What is the force on a point charge q1 contained inside a hollow conductive sphere (or fine grid) with charge q2 and radius R?
Falstaff
The charge q2 on the outer conducting sphere does not affect the field inside the conductor, so the force on q1 is the same as it would be for a grounded conductor. Use an image charge outside the sphere to solve the problem.
 
  • #14
Meir Achuz said:
The charge q2 on the outer conducting sphere does not affect the field inside the conductor, so the force on q1 is the same as it would be for a grounded conductor. Use an image charge outside the sphere to solve the problem.

Good point. If the internal charge can cause the sphere charge to rearrange so it's no longer uniform, you do get internal field. And need to use the image concept to compute the force.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K