Forced response of a mass-spring-damper system

  • Thread starter Thread starter JolileChat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Response System
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the forced response of a mass-spring-damper system using the Laplace Transform. The original poster presents the equation of motion and their attempt at a solution, which involves transforming the equation into the Laplace domain.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss methods such as completing the squares in the denominator and using the convolution theorem. There are questions about the application of the convolution theorem and the process of taking the inverse transform to obtain the time response.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing suggestions on how to proceed with the Laplace domain solution. There is no explicit consensus, but multiple approaches are being explored, including the use of partial fractions and the convolution theorem.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses uncertainty about their algebraic manipulations and the correctness of their approach, indicating potential gaps in their understanding of the process.

JolileChat
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to find the forced response of a mass-spring-damper system by using Laplace Transform.

Homework Equations



Equation of motion:
[tex]\ddot{x} + 2 \zeta \omega_n \dot{x} + {\omega_n}^2 x = \frac{F}{m} cos \left( \omega t \right)[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



At the Laplace domain, we have:

[tex]X \left( S \right) = \frac{F/m}{S^2+ 2 \zeta \omega_n S + {\omega_n}^2} \frac{S}{S^2+\omega^2}[/tex]

After this point, I try to make partial fractions, but I must be missing something. It results in a page full of algebra, and it does not look like the correct solution.

Please, could you help me on figuring out what I should do?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You could complete the squares in the denominator of the first term and then use the convolution theorem. Or use partial fractions on the first term and then use the convolution theorem.
 
nickjer said:
You could complete the squares in the denominator of the first term and then use the convolution theorem. Or use partial fractions on the first term and then use the convolution theorem.

You mean doing the convolution between the impulse response and the cosine forcing function?

I'd like to solve the problem in the Laplace domain, then apply the inverse transform to get the time response.
 
You did solve it in the Laplace domain, assuming that equation you gave in the first post is correct. Now you need to take the inverse transform of that equation. I just recommended using the convolution theorem when taking the inverse.
 
If you want to break it all up by partial fractions you can, but it will get very messy. Another trick would be taking the partial fraction of just the first term and then using the convolution theorem.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K