Forces On a Moving Train Traveling Around a Curve

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the forces acting on a moving train as it travels around a curve at a constant speed. Participants explore the calculations related to centripetal force, mass, and the implications of speed and curvature on train dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant attempts to calculate the forces F1, F2, and F3 acting on the train, providing specific parameters such as speed, weight, radius, and height difference between rails.
  • Another participant clarifies that the weight of the train should be considered as mass, emphasizing that kilograms are a unit of mass, not weight.
  • It is noted that even though the train travels at a constant speed, there is still acceleration due to the change in direction, necessitating a centripetal force for circular motion.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the appropriateness of a speed of 200 mph for a curve with a radius of 500 m, with some participants suggesting that this speed could be dangerous.
  • Discussion includes a comparison to roller coasters, with one participant humorously noting that such speeds would require significant banking angles.
  • The importance of the center of mass in determining the stability and safety of the train at high speeds is mentioned.
  • One participant suggests that F3 can be calculated as the weight multiplied by the cosine of the incline.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of the train traveling at 200 mph around a 500 m curve, with some considering it dangerous while others suggest it might be reasonable under certain conditions. There is no consensus on the calculations or implications of the forces involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants do not fully resolve the calculations related to the forces, and there are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of weight and mass, as well as the implications of speed and curvature on train dynamics.

tomtomtom1
Messages
160
Reaction score
8
TL;DR
Forces Involved Of A Moving Train Travelling Around A Curve
Hello all

I am trying to work out the forces involved of a moving train around a curve traveling at a constant speed.

I have the following:-

Trains.JPG


The image on the left is a cross section of a train traveling around a curve, you can think of the train moving away from you.

The image on the right in the same train but in plane view but illustrates the radius.

I am trying to work out the Forces F1, F2 and F3.

I know the following:-

- Speed = 200mph

- Weight = 101605kg

- Radius = 500m

- Gravity = 9.81m/s^2

- Distance between Rails = 1.2m

- Height Difference between Rail A and Rail B = 0.090m

- Angle = 4.30 deg

The first thing that I tried to do was to convert the train weight of 101605 kg into a Mass by dividing by 9.81 m/s^2, however I ended up with some strange units:-

101605kg / 9.81m/s^2 = 10357.28848 (kg s^2)/m - ??

The reason why I wanted to find the Mass was because I wanted to use the F = MA equation to work out Force in Newtons.

Because I didn't get far with this I tried to convert the speed of the train which is 200mph into an acceleration but since the train is traveling around the curve at a constant speed of 200mph there is no acceleration which I am struggling to come to terms with.

Can I ask how would the Forces F1 F2 and F3 be worked out?

Can anyone point me in the right direction?

Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
tomtomtom1 said:
Weight = 101605 kg
Do you mean mass = 101605 kg ? The kilogram is a unit of mass.

tomtomtom1 said:
constant speed of 200mph there is no acceleration
There is: the velocity of the train changes. Not in magnitude but in direction.

For a circular motion a centripetal force is needed. Can you find out how big it has to be in this case ?

[edit]
200 mph is a disaster speed for a curve radius of 500 m
 
BvU said:
[edit]
200 mph is a disaster speed for a curve radius of 500 m
It's not entirely unreasonable if the train is a roller coaster...
 
200 mph, 500 m -- not a roller coaster
 
I know, I was being a bit facetious (though the fastest roller coaster is 150mph, so that's not that far off). That would be just about a 2G curve though, so it would be pretty ridiculous (and it would require 60 degree banking).

EDIT: Maybe it's 5km? That bank angle from OP's diagram is still not quite enough even in that case, but it at least seems to kind of work out as reasonable...
 
I don't see the position of the center of mass of the car noted anywhere. That will of course determine the actual disaster speed.
 
F3 would be the weight multiplied by the cosine of the incline.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K