Form of the displacement, y(x,t), for the normal modes of a string

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the displacement function, y(x, t), for the normal modes of a string fixed at one end and free at the other. The problem involves understanding the boundary conditions and the implications for the wave function of the string.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the form of the displacement function and the conditions under which it applies. There is an attempt to reconcile the provided boundary conditions with the expected form of the solution. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of the boundary conditions and the implications for the wave function.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the physical interpretation of the boundary conditions, particularly regarding the free end of the string. Others are seeking clarification on the differentiation process and how to apply the boundary conditions to find the correct values for k. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the boundary conditions and their implications for the wave function. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the correct approach and the reasoning behind the conditions given in the problem statement.

RyanTG
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The displacement, y(x; t), of a tight string of length, L, satisfies the conditions
y(0, t) = \frac{\delta y}{\delta x}(L,t) = 0

The wave velocity in the string is v.

a) Explain what is meant by a normal mode. Give the form of the displacement, y(x; t),
for the normal modes of the string and give their frequencies as a function of their
wavenumbers


The Attempt at a Solution



I thought the solution was simply: y(x,t) = Asin(kx)e(-iωnt), where k = \frac{\pin}{L} and ωn=vk. (Subbing the value for k in as well).


But from the mark scheme and looking at later questions, it's obvious that the string is fixed at one point but not at the other. My answer, I think, assumes fixed ends. How can you tell the string is only fixed at one end when the question hasn't wrote in words that is what is going on?

In the mark scheme it has k = \frac{(2n-1)pi}{2L}. Which, when substituted into sin(kx) and then simplified, results in: sin[x(\frac{\pi n}{L}-\frac{\pi}{2L})].

I'm not really sure how to get to the answer they have given. A hint in the right direction would be great, I know there is probably just a gap in my knowledge on this subject.

Edit: Apparently, \frac{\delta y}{\delta x}(L,t) = 0, is the boundary condition which describes the string with a massless ring free to move up and down a frictionless pole parallel to the y-direction at one end. Why is this the case?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A massless ring must have zero net force acting on it. The horizontal component of the tension along the string is countered by the contact force with the pole at the end of the string but there is nothing to counter the vertical component of the tension since the ring is free to move up and down without friction. That means there is to vertical component of the tension at the end of the string, the tension is horizontal at the end of the string, and therefore the string itself is horizontal at its very end. That means the derivative of the wavefunction is zero there - as stated in the problem.

The string is fixed at the origin so sin(kx) is correct. To find k set x=L in the expression for the derivative which will be zero at x=L. use that fact to find the condition that must be satisfied by k. Than find all values of k that satisfy that condition.
 
So I have to differentiate (x,L) = Asin(kL)e(-ivknt)? It seems quite a bit of work for a question like this...
 
The function you'll differentiate is y(x,t) = A sin(kx) eiωt. You only set x = L after the differentiation. It is easy. Since the exponential does not depend on x, it plays as a constant
 
Last edited:
Sorry for being so incompetent...

Is this correct?
kAcos(kL)=0

Disregarding the exponential part since it is a constant. What do I do from here to get the answer in my mark scheme?

Using the above I just end up with kL = 1, k = 1/L, surely? Or L = 1/k.

I haven't done a question like this before and I can't find any resources that help, I'm sorry for literally not having a clue what to do.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K