Formation of emission lines and other topics

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spectroscopy
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the formation of emission and absorption lines in spectroscopy, particularly in the context of hot gas clouds. Participants explore the mechanisms behind these phenomena, the role of atomic and molecular transitions, and the implications of energy absorption and emission. The conversation includes theoretical considerations and speculative scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how emission lines form in a cloud of hot gas that is not illuminated from behind, suggesting that electronic transitions may not fully explain the phenomenon.
  • Another participant explains that individual atoms in excited states emit light when transitioning to lower energy states, leading to bright emission lines, while also noting that not all material emits light collectively.
  • It is proposed that when a light source is present behind the gas, some atoms absorb light and transition to higher energy states, resulting in dark absorption lines, with the wavelengths of emission and absorption lines being the same if the energy states are identical.
  • A later reply seeks clarification on why molecules tend to emit more at frequencies where they absorb more, indicating a desire for deeper understanding.
  • One participant emphasizes the complexity of molecular behavior compared to atomic behavior, discussing discrete energy levels and the absorption/emission process in atoms.
  • Another participant introduces a classical analogy involving a spring and balls to illustrate molecular behavior, questioning the fate of absorbed energy and the concept of thermal equilibrium.
  • One response dismisses the approach to learning physics and suggests studying atomic physics through textbooks instead of engaging in speculative discussions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms of emission and absorption lines, with some focusing on atomic transitions while others introduce molecular complexities. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on certain aspects, particularly regarding the implications of energy absorption and the nature of molecular behavior.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the applicability of classical models to quantum phenomena, and there are unresolved questions about energy transfer and thermal dynamics in the context of molecular systems.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying spectroscopy, atomic and molecular physics, and the principles of energy absorption and emission in gases.

Hak
Messages
709
Reaction score
56
If we spectroscopically observe a cloud of hot gas, which is on the whole not very absorbent, and which is not illuminated by a source behind it, we observe emission lines. How does this type of spectrum form?

I had thought that those lines are those in which there are transitions of atoms is true, but I don't think that's enough. Why should all the material as a whole emit like that. Why are there these electronic transitions?

And then: if there is a light source behind the material, one observes a spectrum that is in a way the negative of the one I put, i.e. the lines become absorption lines. I had thought that something different must be happening in the two cases, although I don't know what.

And then again: if we knew nothing about electronic transitions and only wanted to consider the macroscopic properties of the gas (which could be composed of complicated molecules, in which there are not only electronic transitions but also other phenomena), could we still justify the fact that the emission and absorption spectra are the negative of each other?

Thank you for any input; complex, articulate and in-depth answers are also welcome.

As usual, please feel free to move the thread to the forum you deem most appropriate. Thank you.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
If you have a cloud of hot gas, some atoms are in high energy excited states. When the atoms transition to lower energy states, they emit light of a certain wavelength. When many atoms do this, we see the light as a bright emission line. "all the material as a whole" doesn't emit light. Each atom either transitions to a lower state or not, but in a cloud of gas there are many atoms, so there are many atoms emitting light.

If you have a light source behind the cloud of gas, there are some atoms in the gas that are in lower energy states. These atoms absorb the light from the background source and transition to a higher energy state. This removes some of the light from the background source, so we see a dark absorption line.

If the lower and higher energy states are the same in the two cases, then the wavelength of the bright emission line and the dark absorption line are the same.
 
phyzguy said:
If you have a cloud of hot gas, some atoms are in high energy excited states. When the atoms transition to lower energy states, they emit light of a certain wavelength. When many atoms do this, we see the light as a bright emission line. "all the material as a whole" doesn't emit light. Each atom either transitions to a lower state or not, but in a cloud of gas there are many atoms, so there are many atoms emitting light.

If you have a light source behind the cloud of gas, there are some atoms in the gas that are in lower energy states. These atoms absorb the light from the background source and transition to a higher energy state. This removes some of the light from the background source, so we see a dark absorption line.

If the lower and higher energy states are the same in the two cases, then the wavelength of the bright emission line and the dark absorption line are the same.
Thank you very much. Could you explain better, though, why a molecule tends to emit more at the frequencies where it absorbs more? Thank you again.

(P.S. Is this the correct Forum for such a topic or is there a more specific one? I'm afraid the topic may not interest many people...)
 
Generally we're talking atoms here, not molecules. Molecules are a lot more complicated. Electrons in atoms have discrete energy levels. When the electron moves from state A (lower energy) to state B (higher energy), it absorbs a photon of a specific energy. When it drops down from state B back to state A, it emits a photon of that same energy. That's how atoms behave. Look up any book on atomic physics.
 
phyzguy said:
Generally we're talking atoms here, not molecules. Molecules are a lot more complicated. Electrons in atoms have discrete energy levels. When the electron moves from state A (lower energy) to state B (higher energy), it absorbs a photon of a specific energy. When it drops down from state B back to state A, it emits a photon of that same energy. That's how atoms behave. Look up any book on atomic physics.
Thank you. Initially, I thought of a recently tried experiment. Let's take two very small balls and connect them to a spring. This system is a molecule.

If the molecule is alone, its frequency is the only noticeable one. In fact, the spring+balls system oscillates with a typical frequency and every so often there is a change in its energy. The radiated energy that comes out, the only one there is, is its own light (e.g. our molecule could have red as its light).

Let us now suppose that the molecule is oscillated by many kinds of oscillations (i.e. it is illuminated from behind).
All the oscillations, except the one of the same frequency as the molecule, will be partially absorbed by it then their residual energy will continue on its way.
Where does the energy that the molecule in this case absorbs go? Macroscopically, do we see an increase in the temperature of the gas?
If we observed the system for a very long time we would see that eventually the light disappears.
The only explanation I know of is that a system always tends to have as many configurations as possible, i.e. its entropy increases. And when you have approached the state of equilibrium there is no longer any exchange of energy. This is what is also called thermal death.

Let us imagine that our universe consists of the system in the figure. As mentioned, light eventually disappears, everything is still, and energy, in this case only potential, is minimal. Where does all the other energy go? Did the system responsible for transporting the radiated energy take it by any chance?

I have the impression that this is definitely not how it works at the quantum level and that this cannot be modelled classically. What do you say?
 
This is not the way to learn physics. If you really want to know the answers to your questions, get a book on atomic physics and study it. I'm signing off of this thread.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50 and Motore

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K