Formation of the General Equation for a Power Series

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the formulation of the general equation for a power series using the Method of Frobenius. The key equation derived is C_(k+1) = -2Ck/(k+1)(2k-1), with specific values calculated for C1, C2, C3, and C4. Participants emphasized the importance of recognizing patterns in sequences and using double factorial notation for simplification. The general term for cn is expressed as cn=(-2)^(n+1)c0/((n+1)!(1)(3)(5)...(2n-1)), highlighting the use of ellipsis for clarity in mathematical expressions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Method of Frobenius
  • Familiarity with power series and their general terms
  • Knowledge of factorial and double factorial notation
  • Ability to recognize and express mathematical patterns
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Method of Frobenius in detail, focusing on its applications in differential equations
  • Learn about double factorials and their properties in combinatorial mathematics
  • Explore advanced topics in power series, including convergence and radius of convergence
  • Practice deriving general terms for various sequences and series
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and researchers interested in series solutions to differential equations, particularly those utilizing the Method of Frobenius.

WhiteTrout
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
So I've gotten into the Method of Frobenius and all; Solved a few questions, however the most inconvenient part would be the formulation of the general equations for the final answer.

Granted, the lecturer told us to not spend so much time on that segment due to its minimal weightage, but I prefer to know.

So, here's one which I am on and about right now;

C_(k+1) = -2Ck/(k+1)(2k-1)

k=0; C1= -2Co/(1)(-1)
k=1; C2= -2C1/(2)(1)
k=2; C3= -2C2/(3)(3)
k=3; C4= -2C3/(4)(5)

Their equivalent in terms of Co being
-2Co/(1)(-1)
(-2)^2 Co/(1)(-1)(2)(1)
(-2)^3 Co/(1)(-1)(2)(1)(3)(3)
(-2)^3 Co/(1)(-1)(2)(1)(3)(3)(4)(5)
respectively.

What I have tried doing was
y= Co [Summation of](-2)^(n+1)/(n+1)!(<missing link>)

I cannot complete it because I don't know any function that allows me to pile up previous values, so that the current will be multiplied by the previous.
However, I am pretty sure that this isn't the correct method, so any help given will be very appriciated.

Also, I would love to hear advice on what to look for when creating the general equation.
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WhiteTrout said:
So I've gotten into the Method of Frobenius and all; Solved a few questions, however the most inconvenient part would be the formulation of the general equations for the final answer.

Granted, the lecturer told us to not spend so much time on that segment due to its minimal weightage, but I prefer to know.

So, here's one which I am on and about right now;

C_(k+1) = -2Ck/(k+1)(2k-1)

k=0; C1= -2Co/(1)(-1)
k=1; C2= -2C1/(2)(1)
k=2; C3= -2C2/(3)(3)
k=3; C4= -2C3/(4)(5)

Their equivalent in terms of Co being
-2Co/(1)(-1)
(-2)^2 Co/(1)(-1)(2)(1)
(-2)^3 Co/(1)(-1)(2)(1)(3)(3)
(-2)^3 Co/(1)(-1)(2)(1)(3)(3)(4)(5)
respectively.

What I have tried doing was
y= Co [Summation of](-2)^(n+1)/(n+1)!(<missing link>)

I cannot complete it because I don't know any function that allows me to pile up previous values, so that the current will be multiplied by the previous.
However, I am pretty sure that this isn't the correct method, so any help given will be very appriciated.

Also, I would love to hear advice on what to look for when creating the general equation.
Thank you.

You can't always write them in closed forms with factorials. Sometimes you need to use the ellipsis (...) to indicate "and so forth". When looking for a pattern is is a good idea not to multiply them out (which you apparently already know:biggrin:) and keep things arising from the same factor together. You have an apparent (1)(2)(3)... sequence and a (1)(3)(5)... sequence. So write it like this (Use the X2 icon for subscripts) for n = 3:

(-2)3c0/(-1){(1)(2)(3)(4)}{(1)(3)(5)}

You have almost got it, grouping the -1 with the powers of -2 and the factorial. So the general term for cn would be written

cn=(-2)n+1c0/((n+1)!(1)(3)(5)...(2n-1))

Sometimes there is no avoiding the ellipsis (the three dots).
 
There's also double factorial notation where n! = n(n-2)(n-4)\cdots 1 when n is odd and n! = n(n-2)(n-4)\cdots 2 when n is even. 0! and (-1)! are both defined to be 1 to make writing general formulas easier.

You can also write, for example,
1\cdot 3\cdot 5 \cdots (2k+1) = \frac{1\cdot 2 \cdot 3 \cdots (2k+1)}{2\cdot 4\cdots 2k} = \frac{(2k+1)!}{2^k k!}
 
Hello,

LCKurtz: Alright I'll keep that in mind. I had not much prior encounters with ellipsis because I try not to use them; but this and the other advices would be very very helpful to remember in a pinch, thank you very much.

Vela: So that was what I was missing. I have thought about it before, but I didn't know how to express it correctly. Thanks for the insight, I know what to expect now; And for the heads up about double factorials too. The extra knowledge should be useful.


Thank you both for your time.
It has really helped me a great deal.

<edit> I just did some reading into double factorials and I must say that the identities would be useful;
In such case, the above can also be written as (2n+1)! right?
And its even numbered sibling would be (2n)!

I would really like to know more, but I am not around that area yet so I'll just keep it at this point.

Thank you.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K