I Formula for credit card balance as a function of payments

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding a formula to calculate the time required to pay off credit card debt based on monthly payments and interest rates. The basic formula for an annuity is referenced, where the present value (PV) represents the loan balance, P is the monthly payment, r is the interest rate, and n is the number of periods. To determine n, the formula n = log(P / (P - rPV)) / log(1 + r) is suggested, although it may require iteration for practical use. The complexity increases when solving for the interest rate r, especially for higher-order polynomials. Understanding these calculations is essential for effective debt management.
barryj
Messages
856
Reaction score
51
I have been trying to find the financial formula that will give the balance of a credit card debt as a function of time. Example, at 18% interest, if I pay $150 a month how long will it take me to pay off my debt. When I google, I get pointers to Excello functions. I want to know the exact formula.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It all comes from the basic formula for an annuity

annuity_formula.svg

In your case the PV is the loan balance, P the payment, r the rate and n the number of periods - so you need to solve for n, so it’s easier to just iterate
 
BWV said:
It all comes from the basic formula for an annuity

annuity_formula.svg

In your case the PV is the loan balance, P the payment, r the rate and n the number of periods - so you need to solve for n, so it’s easier to just iterate

Taking logs is hardly difficult. <br /> n = \left.\log\left( \frac{P}{P - rPV}\right)\right/ \log(1 + r). Having made \lfloor n \rfloor payments, you will have one further payment of less than P to make.

Solving for r is the difficult one, as this is a polynomial of order n + 1 which cannot be solved analytically for n \geq 4 (although r = 0 is always a solution).
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K