I Formula for the propagation of complex errors

AI Thread Summary
To propagate errors for complex measurements, the formula f(x, y) = f(x, y) ± √{(∂f/∂x * Δx)² + (∂f/∂y * Δy)²} is used, where x and y are expressed in polar coordinates as x + iy = Re^(iθ). An example function is f(x, y) = x + y², which yields a result of 7 ± 0.41 in the non-complex case. For complex numbers, the result should be expressed as (-18.0 ± 4.0) - (10.5 ± 1.9)i, with R = √(x² + y²) and θ = arctan(y/x). The variance of the amplitude in relation to the variances of the real and imaginary components may follow a Rayleigh distribution if variances are equal, but the generalization for unequal variances remains uncertain. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurate error propagation in complex measurements.
accdd
Messages
95
Reaction score
20
If I have 2 measurements ##x = (3.0 ± 0.1), y = (-2.0 ± 0.1)## and want to calculate how the error propagates when calculating a function from those values this formula should be used: ##f(x, y) = f(x, y) ± \sqrt {(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}*\Delta x)^2+(\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}*\Delta y)^2}##
What is the formula for calculating error propagation if x and y are complex (##x = (3 ± 0.1) + (9.5 ± 0.4)ⅈ, y = (2 ± 0.1) - (5 ± 0.4)ⅈ##)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Change to polar coordinates.
 
Can you give me an example. Suppose the function is: ##f(x, y) = x + y^2##
In the non-complex case, with the data given in the previous post, I would proceed as follows:
##f(x, y) = x + y^2 = (3+(-2)^2) \pm \sqrt{0.1^2+(2*(-2) *0.1)^2}= 7\pm \sqrt{0.01+0.16}=7\pm0.41##
How can I change to polar coordinates to get the result in case of complex numbers?
The result should be: ##(-18.0 ± 4.0) - (10.5 ± 1.9)ⅈ## (Measurement jl)
 
x+iy\equiv Re^{i\theta}where R=\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}} and \theta =\arctan(\frac{y}{x}). This is the easiest representation for complex multiplication (you multiply the argumets and add the angles). Complex addition is easiest in the cartesian notation.
 
I got stuck, not able to get the result. Can someone show me how to do it please?
 
Svein said:
Change to polar coordinates.
After that, you'd have to know the variance of the amplitude as a function of the variances of the real and imaginary components. If they had the same variance, I think you'd have a Rayleigh distribution. I'm not sure how that generalizes to the case of unequal variances. Does that distribution have a special name?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top