Thrust Calculation: 1000 psi Tank, 1 in² Removed

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bluechipx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Thrust
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on thrust calculation from a high-pressure tank scenario, specifically a tank pressurized to 1000 psi with a one square inch opening. When the opening is created, the pressure differential results in a 1000 lb force acting in the opposite direction, as dictated by Newton's Third Law. The conversation also explores the implications of using air versus water for thrust generation, highlighting that compressed air stores potential energy, while liquids do not, affecting thrust dynamics. A test fixture is being developed to measure thrust using a 4500 psi tank and a two-inch ball valve, with expectations of achieving significant thrust values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Third Law of Motion
  • Familiarity with pressure measurement in psi
  • Knowledge of fluid dynamics, specifically in high-pressure systems
  • Experience with thrust measurement techniques and test fixtures
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of thrust generation in rocket propulsion
  • Learn about the differences between compressible and incompressible fluids
  • Investigate the design and operation of high-pressure test fixtures
  • Explore the effects of valve size and opening speed on thrust output
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and hobbyists involved in fluid dynamics, propulsion systems, or high-pressure testing will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in practical applications of thrust calculation and measurement.

bluechipx
Messages
64
Reaction score
30
Let's say we have a tank with 1000 psi pushing in all directions, if we remove one square inch from an end, now the tank has 1000 psi more at one end than the other. Does this mean that there is a 1000 lb push in the opposite direction of the removed square inch?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bluechipx said:
Let's say we have a tank with 1000 psi pushing in all directions, if we remove one square inch from an end, now the tank has 1000 psi more at one end than the other. Does this mean that there is a 1000 lb push in the opposite direction of the removed square inch?
If the force on that square inch jet of water is indeed 1000pounds force then Newton's Third law tells you that there is 1000pounds reaction force on the tank. The forces must be equal.
PS IS someone pumping water into the tank to keep the internal pressure constant?
 
bluechipx said:
Let's say we have a tank with 1000 psi pushing in all directions, if we remove one square inch from an end, now the tank has 1000 psi more at one end than the other. Does this mean that there is a 1000 lb push in the opposite direction of the removed square inch?
Yes, and that's one way of explaining how a rocket generates thrust in a vacuum where "there's nothing to push against". The combustion chamber of a rocket is basically a high-pressure tank with an opening at the back.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
sophiecentaur said:
If the force on that square inch jet of water is indeed 1000pounds force then Newton's Third law tells you that there is 1000pounds reaction force on the tank. The forces must be equal.
PS IS someone pumping water into the tank to keep the internal pressure constant?

I am making a test fixture that will monitor thrust which is still under construction. I will test both ways, just air and air pushing water. I'll try to post pics soon. The tank is a full size high pressure welding type cylinder rated for 4500 psi with a test pressure of 6750 psi. The ball valve is a two inch with a pressure rating of 5000 psi. With no measuring system, I started out with a mere 250 psi yesterday for the first test, then tried 600 next. I am focusing on snapping the valve open as quickly as possible for the best effect, which was very impressive for the low starting pressure.
 
bluechipx said:
, just air and air pushing water
There will be a big practical difference between to two situations. You will need to shift a lot of air, fast, to maintain the sort of pressure compared with doing it with water. But there is a lot of Potential Energy stored in compressed air, compared with the Energy stored in a compressed liquid.
Perhaps you could go into some more detail to help us make the leap between your actual problem and the original question. Was that the 'right' question?
 
Although the actual test will be what matters, I was just curious if there was an accurate way of knowing beforehand what to expect. I have a hydraulic fixture with a one square inch piston (1.128") that applies pressure to a 10,000 psi gauge. The gauge has a telltale pointer that records max pressure. The tank will be pressurized to 4500 psi and released instantly though a two inch dia ball valve. I will be testing both ways, air over water and air only. Anybody care to venture a guess as to the actual thrust both ways? The valve has an area of just over three square inches (3.14). Hopefully I may see 3.14X 4500 = 14,130 lbs, but I suspect in reality the figure will be much lower for reasons I am unaware of.
 
Which direction of thrust is important for you? Is this for a 'projectile' or a ram of some kind?
There is an important factor which I hinted at earlier. If you actually want some Kinetic Energy out of this device then compressed air is probably the way to go because it 'stores' energy whereas a compressed liquid stores virtually none. Otoh, the lack of stored energy makes things more controllable, if you simply want a ram. It's no coincidence that hydraulics are used for working tools and vehicles.
You mentioned a combination of air and water. That could have its advantages in some specialised applications.
Give us a clue.
bluechipx said:
Anybody care to venture a guess as to the actual thrust both ways?
The initial thrust will be the same as the pressure times the area but things will change once the fluid starts to flow.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
751
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K