edward said:
Sorry about that little run around to get to the real landmark. I couldn't find any pictures of the landmark that Google image search didn't recognize. I should have expressed more clearly the; "THIS IS NOT THE REAL LANDMARK" concept. I could have taken some of the real landmark pictures to the paint program and drawn some spiders on them. :D
Ha ha! This is one reason I'm so slow with this new location. Everything of interest is readily recognizable.
But it's always fun looking for landmarks. It's the next best thing to traveling.
edward said:
That is interesting, especially how the neoclassical architecture differs from the surrounding buildings.
This all is a part of my landmark which was Dubar Square. You can post another if you have one or pass it on to OmCheeto, or anyone who has a landmark. If we are lucky OmCheeto has scanned some more old black and white photos that he can post.
I'm afraid that I was born a few years after my last landmark, and have used up pretty much all the locations I've been to.
But this new one is in the same vein.
It was inspired by a phone call from my sister last week.
On her trip to Germany next May, she's stopping off in Chichester England for a few days to do family genealogical research.
Though, this New landmark is nowhere near England.
According to the records I have, a couple of my relatives moved here in 1649.
Also, I'm only looking for the name of the town, as I don't have the family address, nor any family photos.
According to a landmark page devoted to the city, the oldest building still standing, wasn't built for another 75 years.
Here's a picture of it:
ps. I'm a bit embarrassed now by my first photo, but it was the most impressive thing in a 10 minute long video of still images of the town. It's just an apartment complex.
