Fourier Expansion in 3D: Expansion of V(r)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around expanding a function in three dimensions using Fourier series, specifically focusing on the function V(r) = e^(-λr)/r. Participants are exploring the mathematical principles behind Fourier expansions in a multi-dimensional context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the transition from one-dimensional to three-dimensional Fourier expansions, questioning whether the variable r can be treated similarly to x. There is also consideration of the need to express the function in terms of Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) or if a radial approach suffices.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored regarding the dimensionality of the expansion. Some participants suggest that a one-dimensional expansion may be sufficient if the function depends solely on r, while others mention the use of orthogonal functions in different coordinate systems.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of different lengths (L) for each dimension, which may affect the expansion. Additionally, the participants are navigating the constraints of the problem, including the desire to learn from the process while solving it.

Logarythmic
Messages
277
Reaction score
0
I'm used to use

[tex]\tilde{f} (x) = a_n|e_n>[/tex]

where

[tex]|e_n> = e^{2 \pi inx / L}[/tex]

and

[tex]a_n = \frac{1}{L}<e_n|f>[/tex]

for my Fourier expansions.

How do I expand a function in 3 dimensions, for example

[tex]V(\vec{r}) = \frac{e^{-\lambda r}}{r}[/tex]

?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is still just one variable in there, no?
 
---I deleted this, it's mostly nonsense and it does't apply to the problem.---

But in my opinion, mathematically, it makes no difference if you have an r or an x in there; just do the Fourier expansion btw r_0 and r_1 as you would a fct of x.
 
Last edited:
Logarythmic said:
I'm used to use

[tex]\tilde{f} (x) = a_n|e_n>[/tex]

where

[tex]|e_n> = e^{2 \pi inx / L}[/tex]

and

[tex]a_n = \frac{1}{L}<e_n|f>[/tex]

for my Fourier expansions.

How do I expand a function in 3 dimensions, for example

[tex]V(\vec{r}) = \frac{e^{-\lambda r}}{r}[/tex]

?
The basis functions are products whose factors are the 1-D functions in x, y, and z.
 
So [tex]|e_n> = e^{2 \pi in \vec{r} /L} = e^{2 \pi in x /L} e^{2 \pi in y /L} e^{2 \pi in z /L}[/tex] and [tex]r = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + z^2}[/tex]?
 
Yes for the last product on the right and the r; the Ls could be different for each dimension.

[tex]|e_n> = e^{2 \pi in x /L_x} e^{2 \pi in y /L_y} e^{2 \pi in z /L_z}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
So to expand [tex]V(\vec{r})[/tex] I have to rewrite it in terms of x, y ,z or does quasar987 have a point there?
 
Logarythmic said:
So to expand [tex]V(\vec{r})[/tex] I have to rewrite it in terms of x, y ,z or does quasar987 have a point there?
I thought you wanted the expansion for any function in 3-D. If the function is only a function of r, then you could do a 1-D expansion in r. There are other orthogonal functions that are often used in 3-D in cylindrical or spherical coordinates.
 
Yes, first of all I want to solve this problem but I also want to learn something from it. ;)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K