High School Fourier series of a step function

Click For Summary
A Fourier series expansion of a step function is possible, but diverges when applied to infinite step functions, while finite step functions yield valid results. To compute the Fourier series, one can separate the function into constant segments and calculate the integrals for each part, then sum them. An alternative method involves calculating the Fourier series normally and applying a factor to modify the function's behavior, though this may also lead to divergence for many frequencies. The discussion includes a desire to extract a mathematical function from a voltage response graph, suggesting a piecewise definition may be more effective than other methods. Overall, the feasibility of Fourier series for step functions depends on their finiteness and the approach taken.
chikou24i
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Hello, can we make a Fourier series expansion of a (increasing or decreasing) step function ? like the one that I attached here. I just want to know the idea of that if it is possible.
shNoy.png
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can write down the integral, but with an infinite step function like this the integrals will diverge. With a finite step function it works.
 
  • Like
Likes chikou24i
mfb said:
You can write down the integral, but with an infinite step function like this the integrals will diverge. With a finite step function it works.
So you mean that I should take each portion appart (where f(x) is constant) and calculate the integral. Then, I add them all together ?
Is there any other method where I can calculate Fourier series normally and then I multiply them by another factor which will make them increase or decrease ?
 
The sum will diverge as well for most frequencies, and the approach is at best questionable for frequencies where it does not diverge.

Why do you want to Fourier transform that function?
 
I want to extract the mathematical function for this graph of voltage response. Could you please help me or guide me in doing that ?
https://fb-s-d-a.akamaihd.net/h-ak-xlp1/v/t1.0-0/p526x296/17457874_1911500359125961_8184758272904545979_n.jpg?oh=50117debf8fd6047caf1f0795e0a9254&oe=59500784&__gda__=1498980987_b71e34fea90ba330474f88d4a58f82d9
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You could write it as sum of a linear or parabolic function and some periodic term.

I'm not sure if that is really useful, I'm quite sure a piecewise definition of the function will work better.
 
  • Like
Likes chikou24i
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K