Fourier transform field solutions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Fourier transforms in advanced quantum and field theory, particularly in modeling wave functions and fields. It is established that fields can be represented as Fourier transforms of two functions, corresponding to wave propagation in opposite directions. This approach is exemplified in the Klein-Gordon equation as detailed in Peskin and Schroeder, where the field is expressed as a linear combination of positive and negative frequency solutions. The rationale behind this method is to treat each solution as an independent oscillator, incorporating creation and annihilation operators for state manipulation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier transforms and their mathematical properties
  • Familiarity with the Klein-Gordon equation in quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of creation and annihilation operators in quantum mechanics
  • Basic concepts of wave functions and their representations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the Klein-Gordon equation in Peskin and Schroeder
  • Explore the role of creation and annihilation operators in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the mathematical foundations of Fourier analysis in the context of wave functions
  • Investigate the physical interpretations of positive and negative frequency solutions in field theory
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and field theory, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of Fourier transforms in the context of wave functions and fields.

zwoodrow
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I am learning about adv quantum and field theory and i have run across something unfamiliar mathematically. In several instances the author simpy expands the field or a wave function as a Fourier transform. that is they assume the field or wave function is simply the transform of two other functions. I took pde and Fourier analysis and this type of assumption never came up. I know it is a fact that non pathological functions can always be represented as a transform however It sounds like when ever you model any sort of wave trains in field theory the SOP is to just assume the field or wave function is the Fourier transform of two other functions. one function traveling in one direction and the other tranveling in the other direction. Can anyone point me to a quick overview of this type ot thinking. it makes sense to me i just have never seen it done. Also is there a deeper reason for doing this it seems like just an added complication to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When describing em radiation (light, etc.), it can be considered as a function of time. Taking the Fourier transform gives the frequency spectrum.
 
mathman said:
When describing em radiation (light, etc.), it can be considered as a function of time. Taking the Fourier transform gives the frequency spectrum.

I'm not really sure that's what he's asking.

Pages 20-21 of Peskin and Schroeder go through this for the Klein-Gordon equation. The deeper reason is that the field, such as:
<br /> \phi \left(x\right) = \int \frac{d^3 p}{\left(2 \pi\right)^3} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \omega_p}} \left(a_p e^{i px} + a^{\dag}_p e^{-i px}] \right)<br />

I think he's asking why there are two terms, one for the positive solutions, one for the negative. The answer I believe is that instead of each solution existing by itself, we write it as an "independent oscillator" which contains its own creation and annihilation operators for creating and destroying states, and is a linear combination of the two separate states.

Remember back in differential equations that if two solutions to the same differential eq. are sin(kx) and cos(kx), we write the FULL solution as the linear combination of those two.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K