Fourier transform of triangle diagram

  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fourier Transform
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating the Fourier transform of a triangle diagram in position space to its corresponding star diagram in momentum space, specifically within the context of Feynman diagrams. The user expresses confusion regarding the integration process and the appearance of a delta function, suggesting a potential error in their calculations. They clarify that "FT" refers to the Fourier Transform, not 2D images, and emphasize the need to interpret the diagrams correctly in terms of particle interactions. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in transitioning between position and momentum representations in quantum field theory. Understanding these transformations is crucial for accurately analyzing particle interactions.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
Show that the Fourier transform of the triangle diagram in x space in Fig. 1.3b is the
star diagram in p space in Fig. 1.3c.
Relevant Equations
.
1709922409314.png


OBS: Ignore factors of ## (2 \pi) ##, interpret any differential ##dx,dp## as ##d^4x,d^4p##, ##\int = \int \int = \int ... \int##. I am using ##x,y,z## instead of ##x_i##.

Honestly, i am a little confused how to show this "triangle-star duality". Look, the propagators in positions space gives me ##\int \frac{e^{ip(x-y)}}{p^2+m^2} dp##

$$
\int d x d y d z dp_x dp_y dp_z \frac{1}{p_x^2+m^2} \frac{1}{p_y^2+m^2} \frac{1}{p_z^2+m^2} e^{i(p_x (x-y) + p_y (y-z) + p_z (z-x))} e^{-i(q_1 x + q_2 y + q_3 z)}
$$



$$
\int d y d z dp_x dp_y dp_z \frac{1}{p_x^2+m^2} \frac{1}{p_y^2+m^2} \frac{1}{p_z^2+m^2} e^{i(p_x (-y) + p_y (y-z) + p_z (z))} e^{-i( q_2 y + q_3 z)} \delta(p_x - p_z - q_1)
$$


$$
\int d y d z dp_y dp_z \frac{1}{(p_z+q_1)^2+m^2} \frac{1}{p_y^2+m^2} \frac{1}{p_z^2+m^2} e^{i((p_z + q_1) (-y) + p_y (y-z) + p_z (z))} e^{-i( q_2 y + q_3 z)}
$$



$$
\int d z dp_y dp_z \frac{1}{(q_2 - p_y)^2+m^2} \frac{1}{p_y^2+m^2} \frac{1}{p_z^2+m^2} e^{i( + p_y (-z) + p_z (z))} e^{-i( q_3 z)} \delta (-p_z - q_1 + p_y - q_2)
$$



$$
\int d z dp_z \frac{1}{(q_1+p_z)^2+m^2} \frac{1}{(q_2 + q_1 + p_z)^2+m^2} \frac{1}{p_z^2+m^2} e^{i( (q_2+q_1+p_z)(-z) + p_z (z))} e^{-i( q_3 z)}
$$

$$
\int dp_z \frac{1}{(q_1+p_z)^2+m^2} \frac{1}{(q_2 + q_1 + p_z)^2+m^2} \frac{1}{p_z^2+m^2} \delta(q_1+q_2+q_3)
$$

If there was no ##p_z## integral, i think the answer would be correct (the ##\delta## i got is an indication of it, i think). Where did i committed an error?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LCSphysicist said:
Homework Statement: Show that the Fourier transform of the triangle diagram in x space in Fig. 1.3b is the
star diagram in p space in Fig. 1.3c.
Relevant Equations: .

View attachment 341469
Can you define both the diagram and what you mean by FT?
Are you talking about functions in 2D (images)?
 
Philip Koeck said:
Can you define both the diagram and what you mean by FT?
Are you talking about functions in 2D (images)?
By FT i mean Fourier Transform.
These images represents Feynman Diagrams, actually. In position (triangle) and momentum (star) space.
 
  • Like
Likes Philip Koeck
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...