Fourier Transforms - The Convolution Theorem.

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
Ok so I've seen the convolution theorem written as:

F(h(x)[itex]\otimes[/itex]g(x))=H(k)G(k)

(And this is how it appears when I have a quick google).

My book then does a problem in which is uses:

F(h(x)g(x))=H(k)[itex]\otimes[/itex]G(k)

Where H(k)=F(h(x)) and similarly G(k)=F(g(x)),
and F represents a Fourier transform


My question
- I can't see how these are equivalent at all?

Many Thanks to anyone who can help shed some light !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
binbagsss said:
Ok so I've seen the convolution theorem written as:

F(h(x)[itex]\otimes[/itex]g(x))=H(k)G(k)

(And this is how it appears when I have a quick google).

My book then does a problem in which is uses:

F(h(x)g(x))=H(k)[itex]\otimes[/itex]G(k)

Where H(k)=F(h(x)) and similarly G(k)=F(g(x)),
and F represents a Fourier transform


My question
- I can't see how these are equivalent at all?

Many Thanks to anyone who can help shed some light !

Take a look at:
http://ugastro.berkeley.edu/infrared09/PDF-2009/convolution2.pdf

It gives an argument for the formula on the last page.