Fractal Nature of Gravitational Forces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of a fractal nature of gravitational forces, proposing that gravity may follow a power law across different scales. The author illustrates this idea by defining a "0.1G line," which represents the distance from a mass where gravitational force diminishes to 10% of its surface value. The author suggests that this relationship could be consistent from atomic particles to galactic scales, indicating a potential fractal pattern in gravitational interactions. The conversation invites further exploration of the mathematical implications of this fractal concept in gravity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational force and its measurement (e.g., Newton's law of universal gravitation)
  • Familiarity with power laws in physics
  • Basic knowledge of atomic structure and particle physics
  • Concepts of distance and mass in astrophysics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical framework of power laws in physics
  • Explore the implications of gravitational fields at varying distances from massive bodies
  • Study fractal geometry and its applications in physical sciences
  • Investigate gravitational interactions at atomic and galactic scales
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in the theoretical aspects of gravity and its behavior across different scales.

Lostpinky
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

I'm no expert, nor have had any training, i just read a lot so I would be interested in some debate about an idea I have after reading lots of different things.

To try help explain the idea I've drawn a crude picture which is attached.

Can anyone explain to me the possibility of having a fractal nature to Gravity. I know gravity is a force and not matter therefore it cannot be directly fractal by itself but it may follow a law of power.

In the picture let's assume we take the force of gravity (G) as 1 on the surface of the Earth, or the moon, or the sun whatever macro body you like.

The we travel a certain distance away until G is 1/10th of surface gravity at which point G would be 1^-1.

Given the mass of the object affecting the actual value of G
EG: Earth G=9.98m/s^2, the moon G=1.625m/s^2
The distance from an object at which you reach 1^-1G would be proportional.

EG: For Earth at about 1.5 million km distance the sun's gravity overwhelms Earth's gravity

So let's say 10% Earth G is about 1350000km from Earth. I don't know if there is a name for this distance but let's call it the "0.1G line".

Now if the 0.1G line is proportional for all masses in the solar system let's move it down to the atomic level.

Imagine being on the surface of an electron or proton. you would feel 1G based on the mass of the particle. You're 0.1G line distance from the particle would be proportional to that of the Earth, depending on mass.

Blow it up further to the size of the galaxy. The 0.1G line would be a proportional distance from the Galactic mass.

Of course:
- Mass affects gravity.
- The more massive/dense the object the higher the gravitational field.

BUT

If you picture this sort of relationship you see that gravity on the largest scale is a power factor stronger than gravity at our scale, and that is powers stronger than gravity on the atomic level.

Is this type of law of powers application to gravity on several scales mathematically possible or am I misunderstanding things?

If it is possible then it follows a possible fractal pattern where gravity is the same at every level just orders of magnitude in difference.

If gravity drops away at a exponential rate then does it do so on both galactic and stellar scales?
 

Attachments

  • fractalgrav.JPG
    fractalgrav.JPG
    8 KB · Views: 507
Physics news on Phys.org
1 to the power of anything is 1 so what your saying seems kind of confusing. Do you mean 1*10^x?
 
1x10^-1 which is 0.1 sorry :-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K