Free Falling Object: Calc. d = 19.6m in 1s

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance a free-falling object travels in one second, starting from rest. Using the formula d = v1t + 1/2at^2, the calculated distance for the first second is 4.9 meters, leading to a total distance of 19.6 meters when multiplied by four. A participant expresses doubt, citing a classmate's answer of 274 meters, which is deemed incorrect as it would imply an unrealistic fall of 68.5 meters in the first second. The consensus is that the original calculation is logical and accurate. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying physics principles to solve motion problems.
Mid
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A free falling object starts from rest and travels a quarter of its full distance in one second. solve for how far the object falls in total?
Relevant Equations
gravity (9.8 m/s), motion formulas
v1 = 0 m/s
a = 9.8 m/s
t = 1sec
d = ?

d = v1t + 1/2at^2
d = 4.9 m
total distance = 4.9*4
= 19.6 m
thats what i was doing but i think I am wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello @Mid,

Welcome to PF! :welcome:

Mid said:
Homework Statement: A free falling object starts from rest and travels a quarter of its full distance in one second. solve for how far the object falls in total?
Homework Equations: gravity (9.8 m/s), motion formulas

v1 = 0 m/s
a = 9.8 m/s
t = 1sec
d = ?

d = v1t + 1/2at^2
d = 4.9 m
total distance = 4.9*4
= 19.6 m
I'll agree with that. :smile:

thats what i was doing but i think I am wrong
What makes you think you're wrong?
 
collinsmark said:
Hello @Mid,

Welcome to PF! :welcome:I'll agree with that. :smile:What makes you think you're wrong?
I'm in grade 12 and this question was directly taken from 1st year university physics and my teacher said the answer isn't that simple to get and students in my class got the answer to be around 274 m
 
Mid said:
I'm in grade 12 and this question was directly taken from 1st year university physics and my teacher said the answer isn't that simple to get and students in my class got the answer to be around 274 m
The answer is quite simple if you approach the problem logically, as you have done.

274m cannot possible be correct, as the object would have to fall 68.5m in the first second.
 
Beams of electrons and protons move parallel to each other in the same direction. They ______. a. attract each other. b. repel each other. c. neither attract nor repel. d. the force of attraction or repulsion depends upon the speed of the beams. This is a previous-year-question of CBSE Board 2023. The answer key marks (b) as the right option. I want to know why we are ignoring Coulomb's force?
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
I treat this question as two cases of Doppler effect. (1) When the sound wave travels from bat to moth Speed of sound = 222 x 1.5 = 333 m/s Frequency received by moth: $$f_1=\frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ (2) When the sound wave is reflected from moth back to bat Frequency received by bat (moth as source and bat as observer): $$f_2=\frac{333}{333-v}\times f_1$$ $$230.3=\frac{333}{333-v}\times \frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ Solving this equation, I get ##v=6.1## m/s but the answer key is...