MHB Free Modules w/Multiple Bases: 2nd Issue w/Example 5 (Paul E. Bland)

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am trying to understand Section 2.2 on free modules and need help with Example 5 showing a module with two bases ... ...

Thanks to Caffeinemachine, I have largely clarified one issue/problem I had with Example 5, but now have a second, separate issue ... (see below)Example 5 reads as follows:https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/3577In an argument that begins: (see above text from Bland)

" ... ... So if $$R = \text{End}_{ \mathbb{Z} } (M)$$, then ... ... "

Bland concludes that

" ... ... $$R$$ has a basis with one element and a basis with two elements ... ... "

To say that I do not follow this argument would be an understatement!

Can someone help me to understand Bland's argument?

I would appreciate help in this matter ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

I'm guessing that statement was confusing since in a vector space setting, bases of the same vector space have the same cardinality. What Bland showed in his example is that an $R$-module may have two bases of different cardinality. For other examples, read the article in the following link:

example of free module with bases of diffrent cardinality | planetmath.org

He's also doing this example to motivate the concept of directly finite and infinite modules. Already, you know that finite dimensional vector spaces are directly finite modules. In Bland's example, however, $M$ is a directly infinite module.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top