Frequencies of standing wave in pipe

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the frequencies of standing waves in a pipe that is closed at one end and open at the other. The original poster presents a problem involving a 0.5m pipe resonating at 600Hz for the second harmonic (n=2) and seeks to determine the speed of sound using different formulas for resonant frequencies.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss two different formulas for calculating resonant frequencies in a closed pipe and question which formula is appropriate for the given problem. There is an exploration of how the formulas relate to the values of n and their implications for resonant frequencies.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the formulas, noting that both can be correct depending on the counting convention for n. The conversation indicates a productive exchange of ideas, with participants exploring the implications of each formula without reaching a definitive conclusion on which to use.

Contextual Notes

There is an implicit assumption that the problem may require knowledge of the specific formula used in class or textbooks, which has not been explicitly stated in the thread.

susdu
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A speaker is placed near the open end of a 0.5m pipe (closed on the other end).
what is the speed of sound if the pipe resonances at 600Hz for n=2?



Homework Equations



fn=(2n+1)*V/4L
Or?
fn=(2n-1)*V/4L

The Attempt at a Solution



I saw both versions of the formulas above, which one is correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both formulas are correct. The first one assumes that the possible values of n are 0, 1, 2, 3, ... The second formula assumes the values of n are 1, 2, 3, ... So both formulas will produce the same set of resonant frequencies.

However, since the formulas produce a different frequency for the same n, you would need to know which formula the problem wants you to use. It's probably the same formula that was used in class or in your textbook.
 
Thanks for the clarification!
 
Well, the bottom version of the formula obviously doesn't work for n = 0, whereas the top one does, so I'm assuming the two versions are just dependent on where you start counting from. They both generate identical harmonics if you let n be 0, 1, 2, 3, ... for the top one and 1, 2, 3, ... for the bottom one.

EDIT: I was sitting there too long with my compose window open while doing something else and got beaten to the punch!
 
Thanks anyway cepheid.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K