How to find Fourier Transform of pulse and apply it on filter response?

  • Thread starter Thread starter russel.arnold
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Domain Frequency
Click For Summary
To find the Fourier Transform of a temporal pulse for a known filter response, one must first transform the pulse into the frequency domain, represented as a summation of A(w)exp(iwt). The filter's amplitude and phase response, calculated numerically at discrete frequencies, can then be used to determine the output by applying the relationship A(w)*H(w)*exp(jwt). It is suggested to model the transfer function as a polynomial of poles and zeros, noting that changes in slope indicate these features. Convolution in the time domain corresponds to multiplication in the frequency domain, allowing for the application of the filter response to the transformed pulse.
russel.arnold
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I have a filter whose amplitude and phase response in terms of w(omega) is known to me which i calculated numerically. Hence, the value is known only for discrete values of w(omega).

Now, I want to know the output which this filter will produce on sending a temporal pulse(pulse in time domain) as my input.

I know i need to Fourier transform my pulse( in the form summation(A(w)exp(iwt)) and then write the output as something like summation(A(w)*H(w)*exp(jwt)).

The question is how can i find the Fourier transform (i.e find A(w) at those w where response of filter is known)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
russel.arnold said:
Hi all,

I have a filter whose amplitude and phase response in terms of w(omega) is known to me which i calculated numerically. Hence, the value is known only for discrete values of w(omega).

Now, I want to know the output which this filter will produce on sending a temporal pulse(pulse in time domain) as my input.

I know i need to Fourier transform my pulse( in the form summation(A(w)exp(iwt)) and then write the output as something like summation(A(w)*H(w)*exp(jwt)).

The question is how can i find the Fourier transform (i.e find A(w) at those w where response of filter is known)

Usually you model the transfer function as a polynomial of poles and zeros. You know the DC gain and you see that whenever the transferfunction slope changes +-20 dB/decade that you have a pole or zero at that place.

Edit: I think this is more commonly done in the laplace domain than in the Fourier domain.
 
russel.arnold said:
Hi all,

I have a filter whose amplitude and phase response in terms of w(omega) is known to me which i calculated numerically. Hence, the value is known only for discrete values of w(omega).

Now, I want to know the output which this filter will produce on sending a temporal pulse(pulse in time domain) as my input.

I know i need to Fourier transform my pulse( in the form summation(A(w)exp(iwt)) and then write the output as something like summation(A(w)*H(w)*exp(jwt)).

The question is how can i find the Fourier transform (i.e find A(w) at those w where response of filter is known)

Well, since you have a filter whose amplitude and phase response in terms of w(omega) is known you can use those discrete values to determine the increment in which they are increasing/decreasing at... although I am not exactly sure how you have these values/the manner in which you calculated them.

When you transform your pulse (you never directly mentioned what kind) yielding a 'continuous' waveform, simply plug that incrementing discrete values of frequency in it. Remember, convolution in the Time Domain is multiplication in the Frequency Domain.
 
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K