Frequency of oscillation (spring)

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 11K views
Gold3nlily
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two identical springs of spring constant 240 N/m are attached to each side of a block of mass 21 kg. The block is set oscillating on the frictionless floor. What is the frequency (in Hz) of oscillation?

Figure:
http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs4957/art/qb/qu/c15/fig15_30.gif

Homework Equations


w = sq(k/m)
w = omega = angular frequency
k = spring constant
m = mass

w=2(pi)f
f = w/(2pi)

The Attempt at a Solution



So this problem seemed simple enough...
w = sq(k/m)
w = sq(240/21)
w = 3.38

f = w/(2pi)
f = 3.38/(2pi) = 0.538Hz

Why is this wrong? It must have something to do with there being two springs... but I don't know how that would change things.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose that if the block were at rest at the equilibrium point you were to displace it, say, towards the left-hand spring by a small amount x. Each spring is going to react with some force. What would be the net force required to make the displacement? How does that compare to what a single spring would do?
 
gneill said:
Suppose that if the block were at rest at the equilibrium point you were to displace it, say, towards the left-hand spring by a small amount x. Each spring is going to react with some force. What would be the net force required to make the displacement? How does that compare to what a single spring would do?

This may sound silly but wouldn't they cancel each other out becasue they are pulling from opposite directions?

hmm...

One would be pushing (KE?), and one would be pulling (PE?).
Maybe I am to use energy conservation?
There are no external forces, so then Emec is conserved.

KE = 1/2* K (Xm)2 sin2(wt + :theta:)
U(t)= 1/2* k (Xm)2cos2(wt + :theta:)

but it would be difficult to get "w" out of those functions. Is there a better way to do this?
 
Gold3nlily said:
This may sound silly but wouldn't they cancel each other out becasue they are pulling from opposite directions?

hmm...

One would be pushing (KE?), and one would be pulling (PE?).

One will be pulling and one will be pushing, yes. But pay attention to the directions of the forces that result! If the displacement x is to the left the spring on the left, being compressed, will push to the right. Meanwhile, the spring on the right, being stretched, will pull to the right. So both forces are to the right, opposite the direction of the displacement.
 
gneill said:
So both forces are to the right, opposite the direction of the displacement.

Okay, so my guess is that I look at hook's law: F= -Kd
If the forces are moving together then -->
2F = -kd
so K will be half the size.

So then I apply that to this equation:
w = sq(.5k/21) = 2.39
f = w/(2pi) = (2.39/(2pi)) = 0.380 s-1??
 
No, the force is doubled. F = -2Kd.

What, then, is the effective spring constant?