Frequency of oscillation of a rod with two springs

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the frequency of oscillation of a rod supported by two springs, focusing on the equilibrium conditions and the dynamics of the system. The participants explore the relationship between the elongation of the springs and the resulting motion of the rod.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the equations of motion for the system, considering both linear and rotational dynamics. They question the assumptions about the elongation of the springs and the net torque acting on the system in equilibrium.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correctness of different approaches to the problem. Some participants suggest that the elongation of the springs may not be equal, while others reflect on the necessity of analyzing both torque and force to reach a conclusion about the system's behavior.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of considering both torque and force analysis in rigid body motion, highlighting potential contradictions in their assumptions regarding the forces exerted by the springs and the hinge.

Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement



upload_2017-8-16_11-8-50.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Let's take that in equilibrium, both springs S_l and S_r are elongated by ##x_e##.
Assuming that the oscillations are so small that the springs could be taken along x- axis approximately.
At time t, S_l is elongated by x. The rod makes an angle ## \theta ## with vertical axis such that
## \tan \theta = \frac x {\frac l 2 }
##
This gives that the S_r will be elongated by x' = ## 2 \tan \theta = 2x ##

Eqn. of motion of com gives,
## k ( x_e + x ) (-\hat x ) +k (x_e -2x) \hat x = m \ddot x \hat x ##
## -3kx = m\ddot x##
## \omega = \sqrt (\frac {3k} m )##

Is this correct so far?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Another attempt:
Motivated from the OP's solution,
Torque eqn. about the pivot-point,
## k ( x_e + x ) \frac l 2 (-\hat z ) +k (x_e -2x) l \hat z= I \ddot \theta \hat z ##
But in equilibrium, the above eqn. gives me non-zero net torque, so it means that the elongation is not same for both the springs.
Let's say that in equilibrium, LHS elongation is ##x_{le} ## and RHS elongtion is ## x_{re}##, and ## x_{le } ≠ x_{re} ## . But these elongations are such that the net torque on the system about the pivot is zero in the equilibrium
But, this tells that net force acting on the com is non - zero in equilb. { A CONTRADICTION ?}

## \tan \theta = \frac {2x } l
\\ \text{ for small , } \theta ,
\\ \tan \theta≈ \theta
\ddot \theta = \frac {2 \ddot x} l##
So,
## k x \frac l 2 (-\hat z ) +k ( -2x) l \hat z= I \ddot \theta \hat z = \frac {ml^2}3 (\frac {2 \ddot x} l) ##
## \frac { -5} 2 kx = \frac 2 3 m \ddot x ##
## \omega = \sqrt {(\frac {15 k} {4 m}) }##

But how to decide the correctness of both the solutions?
 
Pushoam said:
in equilibrium, both springs S_l and S_r are elongated by xe.
Is that possible? What would the two torques about the pivot be?
 
haruspex said:
Is that possible?
No, it is not.
In the OP, I thought that it were only springs which were exerting forces along x-axis. Consequently, forces by them should be equal in magnitude in eqbm and so their elongation.
But, torque analysis in post #2 says that it is not so.
SO, I think the HINGE also exert force along x-axis to make the center of mass in eqbm. I missed it.

LEARNING: IN CASE OF RIGID BODY MOTION, I SHOULD DO BOTH TORQUE AND FORCE ANALYSIS BEFORE GOING AHEAD.
So, the solution in post #2 is correct.
Is this correct so far?
 
Pushoam said:
the solution in post #2 is correct.
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pushoam
Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K