Frequency to wavelength question (thermal Doppler broadening)

  • Thread starter Thread starter dartingeyes
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between frequency and wavelength, particularly in the context of thermal Doppler broadening. It clarifies that the equation \(\nu = c/\lambda\) does not directly apply to small variations in frequency and wavelength. The derivation shows that the product \(\omega\lambda\) remains constant, leading to the relationship \(\Delta\lambda/\lambda \simeq -\Delta\omega/\omega\). This highlights the importance of understanding variations rather than just the static relationship between frequency and wavelength. The clarification is essential for grasping the nuances of Doppler broadening effects.
dartingeyes
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
I don't understand how to go from one equation to the other
Relevant Equations
provided in picture
I want to understand how the two equations in the picture are the same. I am confused because \nu=c/\lambda. This would mean that the term on the right side of the equation in the square root, call it x, would then become x^-1. The resulting equation being \Delta\lambda = \lambda x^-1. But somehow this is not the case?
1747768513647.webp
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you are saying is only true for the relationship between frequency and wavelength themselves - not their small variation.

From ##\omega \propto 1/\lambda## follows that ##\Delta\omega \propto \Delta\lambda /\lambda^2 \propto \Delta\lambda (\omega/\lambda)##.
 
Orodruin said:
What you are saying is only true for the relationship between frequency and wavelength themselves - not their small variation.

From ##\omega \propto 1/\lambda## follows that ##\Delta\omega \propto \Delta\lambda /\lambda^2 \propto \Delta\lambda (\omega/\lambda)##.
Thank you. This tracks for me.
 
A somewhat cleaner derivation:

The product ##\omega\lambda## is constant so ##0=\Delta(\omega\lambda) \simeq \omega \Delta\lambda + \lambda\Delta\omega##. This directly leads to ##\Delta\lambda/\lambda \simeq - \Delta\omega/\omega##.
 
Thread 'Chain falling out of a horizontal tube onto a table'
My attempt: Initial total M.E = PE of hanging part + PE of part of chain in the tube. I've considered the table as to be at zero of PE. PE of hanging part = ##\frac{1}{2} \frac{m}{l}gh^{2}##. PE of part in the tube = ##\frac{m}{l}(l - h)gh##. Final ME = ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}gh^{2}## + ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}##. Since Initial ME = Final ME. Therefore, ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}## = ##\frac{m}{l}(l-h)gh##. Solving this gives: ## v = \sqrt{2g(l-h)}##. But the answer in the book...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K