Frequency to wavelength question (thermal Doppler broadening)

  • Thread starter Thread starter dartingeyes
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between frequency and wavelength in the context of thermal Doppler broadening. The equation \(\nu = c/\lambda\) is examined, leading to the conclusion that small variations in frequency and wavelength are interconnected through the derivation \(\Delta\lambda/\lambda \simeq -\Delta\omega/\omega\). The participants clarify that the proportionality \(\omega \propto 1/\lambda\) is essential for understanding the variations, emphasizing that the product \(\omega\lambda\) remains constant during these changes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic wave mechanics, particularly frequency and wavelength relationships.
  • Familiarity with the concept of thermal Doppler broadening in physics.
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically differentiation and proportionality.
  • Ability to interpret mathematical expressions and equations in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Doppler effect in various contexts, including thermal effects.
  • Learn about the implications of the product \(\omega\lambda\) being constant in wave mechanics.
  • Explore advanced topics in wave-particle duality and their mathematical representations.
  • Investigate the applications of thermal Doppler broadening in spectroscopy and astrophysics.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, researchers in wave mechanics, and professionals in fields related to spectroscopy and astrophysics will benefit from this discussion.

dartingeyes
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
I don't understand how to go from one equation to the other
Relevant Equations
provided in picture
I want to understand how the two equations in the picture are the same. I am confused because \nu=c/\lambda. This would mean that the term on the right side of the equation in the square root, call it x, would then become x^-1. The resulting equation being \Delta\lambda = \lambda x^-1. But somehow this is not the case?
1747768513647.webp
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you are saying is only true for the relationship between frequency and wavelength themselves - not their small variation.

From ##\omega \propto 1/\lambda## follows that ##\Delta\omega \propto \Delta\lambda /\lambda^2 \propto \Delta\lambda (\omega/\lambda)##.
 
Orodruin said:
What you are saying is only true for the relationship between frequency and wavelength themselves - not their small variation.

From ##\omega \propto 1/\lambda## follows that ##\Delta\omega \propto \Delta\lambda /\lambda^2 \propto \Delta\lambda (\omega/\lambda)##.
Thank you. This tracks for me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
A somewhat cleaner derivation:

The product ##\omega\lambda## is constant so ##0=\Delta(\omega\lambda) \simeq \omega \Delta\lambda + \lambda\Delta\omega##. This directly leads to ##\Delta\lambda/\lambda \simeq - \Delta\omega/\omega##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K