Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker model

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) model does not possess equilibrium points, as the scale factor a(t) is continuously changing. This makes traditional stability analysis using Lyapunov functions unfeasible, since equilibrium points are necessary for such analyses. The discussion highlights that while static universes can be considered under special cases, such as the Einstein static universe, these do not apply to the general FLRW model. Participants emphasized the importance of having a graduate-level understanding of the subject to engage meaningfully in advanced discussions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker model
  • Familiarity with Lyapunov stability theory
  • Knowledge of cosmological concepts such as scale factors
  • Graduate-level mathematics background
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the cosmological constant in static universes
  • Study the properties of Minkowski space within the context of FLRW models
  • Explore advanced stability analysis techniques beyond Lyapunov functions
  • Investigate the mathematical formulation of scale factors in cosmology
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, cosmologists, and researchers in theoretical physics focusing on stability analysis and cosmological models.

Nicole01
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
stability analysis of the FLRW model using the Lyapunov direct function
I am a math student conducting a study on the stability analysis of the FLRW model using the Lyapunov direct function. To do that, I need to find the equilibrium points of FLRW and create a Lyapunov function to carry out the study. Do i find the equilibrium points by setting time derivatives to zero so that a(t) equals 0?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Nicole01 said:
the equilibrium points of FLRW
An FLRW model doesn't have any equilbrium points. The scale factor is always changing in any FLRW model.
 
Nicole01 said:
so that a(t) equals 0?
a(t) is never zero in any FLRW model.
 
Then how do I conduct stability analysis using lyapunovs function if I don't have equilibrium points to conclude whether the trajectories converge or diverge
 
PeterDonis said:
An FLRW model doesn't have any equilbrium points. The scale factor is always changing in any FLRW model.
Making a static universe is literally why Einstein originally introduced the cosmological constant. Then you have pathological cases such as Minkowski space, which is technically on FLRW form.
 
Orodruin said:
Making a static universe is literally why Einstein originally introduced the cosmological constant. Then you have pathological cases such as Minkowski space, which is technically on FLRW form.
Yes, these are edge cases where one can have a sort of "equilibrium", and at least in the Einstein static universe case, the idea of doing a "stability analysis" makes sense (the result of such an analysis is already known). It does not seem to me that the OP's question was limited to such special cases, however.
 
Nicole01 said:
how do I conduct stability analysis using lyapunovs function if I don't have equilibrium points to conclude whether the trajectories converge or diverge
Um, you can't?
 
PeterDonis said:
a(t) is never zero in any FLRW model.
Sorry, ##a(t)## in any FLRW models in standard coordinates is the "scale" factor for the spatial metric on each spacelike hypersurface of constant cosmological time ##t## ?
 
Last edited:
cianfa72 said:
Sorry, ##a(t)## in any FLRW models in standard coordinates is the "scale" factor for the spatial metric on each spacelike hypersurface of constant cosmological time ##t## ?
Yes
 
  • #10
cianfa72 said:
##a(t)## in any FLRW models in standard coordinates is the "scale" factor for the spatial metric on each spacelike hypersurface of constant cosmological time ##t## ?
Yes. And please note that anyone posting in an "A" level thread on this topic should not even need to ask this question. "A" level means you should have a graduate level knowledge of the subject matter, and one of the reasons for that level designation is to avoid having advanced threads cluttered with basic questions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Orodruin and cianfa72

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K