Frobenius Method: Solving for General Solution of 4xy'' + 2y' + y = 0 [x7/2]

  • Thread starter Thread starter alphamu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frobenius Method
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on using the Frobenius method to solve the differential equation 4xy'' + 2y' + y = 0, specifically for the general solution around x = 0. The indicial equation derived is λ(λ-1) = 0, yielding roots λ1 = 1 and λ2 = 0. The recurrence relation established is am+1 = -am / (λ+m+1)², which generates coefficients a1 through a8. The participants confirm the need to find a second solution y2 using the method of logarithmic terms due to the singularity at m=1 when λ=0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Frobenius method for solving differential equations
  • Familiarity with power series expansions
  • Knowledge of recurrence relations in mathematical series
  • Basic concepts of singular points in differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Frobenius method in detail
  • Learn about singular points and their implications in differential equations
  • Explore advanced techniques for finding second solutions in differential equations
  • Practice solving similar differential equations using power series methods
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and researchers focusing on differential equations, particularly those interested in series solutions and the Frobenius method.

alphamu
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Use the method of Frobenius, constructing a power series about x = 0,
to find the general solution of this equation (retain terms up to and including those in
square brackets):

4xy'' + 2y' + y = 0 [x7/2]

Note: the solution can be written in closed form, can you see how?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



set y = \sum anxλ+n to obtain:

4x∑(between n=0 and ∞) an(λ+n)(λ+n-1)xλ+n-2 + 2∑(between n=0 and ∞) an(λ+n)xλ+n-1 + ∑(between n=0 and ∞) anxλ+n = 0

Now relabelling the indices using m = n-1 for the first term, m=n-1 for the second term and m=n for the third term here, in order to get a common coefficient of xλ+m for all terms, will give:

4∑(between m=-1 and ∞) am+1(λ+m+1)(λ+m)xλ+m + 2∑(between m =-1 and ∞) am+1(λ+m+1)xλ+m + ∑(between m=0 and ∞) amxλ+m = 0

Now look at terms when m=-1 (coefficient xλ-1):

4[a02-λ)] + 2[a0λ] = 0

so 4a0λ2 - 4a0λ +2a0λ = 4a0λ2 - 2a0λ = 2a0(λ(λ-1)) = 0

with a0 \neq 0, we have our indicial equation:

λ(λ-1) = 0 so λ1 = 1 and λ2 = 0

The remaining terms give:

∑(between m=0 and ∞) { am+1[(λ+m+1)(λ+m) + (λ+m+1)] + am } xλ+m = 0

so this means ∑(between m=0 and ∞) { am+1[(λ+m+1)2] + am } xλ+m = 0

By taking the am term to the other side and diving by (λ+m+1)2 gives me the recurrence relation:

am+1 = -am / (λ+m+1)2, m= 0, 1, 2, ...

Now looking at λ=1:

am+1 = -am / (m+2)2

and by substituting in values of m=0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 will give me a0, ... , a8 which are the following:

a1 = -a0 / 4, a2 = -a1 / 9, a3 = -a2 / 16 and so on with the denominator being a squared value of (m+2) each time up until a8 = -a7 / 81

Here is the part I'm not sure of, I tried to use these to obtain the first part of the general solution (y1)... by substituting into the general form y = a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ...

I got, y1 = -4a1 - 9a2x - 16a3x2 - 25a4x3 - 36a5x4 - 49a6x5 - 64a7x6 - 81a8x7

and then taking square root of this, i.e. (y1)1/2, gave me the first part of the general solution in a complex form.

Is what I have done so far correct to here? I am confident it is up to the recurrence relation where I'm struggling to form a general solution after this.

I know that you need to use the other value of λ=0 to find the other part of the general solution y2 and your final general solution will be y(x) = y1 + y2.

Again here I am not sure how to find y2 because I've used the recurrence relation to get a0, ... , a8 again but by the Frobenius method if you have two values of λ that differ by an integer (which is the case here), you examine the recurrence relation for λ2 which I have done, but because the recurrence relation is singular at m=1 when λ=0, you seek a second solution y2 by using:

y2 = y1 ln|x| + ∑bnxλ+n

Would this be the correct way to find the second solution and are my working for the first solution correct?

Can anyone help me please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I got a different indicial equation: ##4\lambda^2-2\lambda=0##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
962
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K