Front crash with crumple zone: relative velocity calculation

Click For Summary
The EURONCAP front crash test simulates a vehicle traveling at 64 kph colliding with a deformable barrier, representing a head-on collision between two cars at 55 kph. The calculation of relative velocity considers absorbed kinetic energy rather than just speed, leading to the conclusion that two cars moving at 32 kph would not yield the same impact effect. The deformable barrier allows for some movement, which simulates lower speeds in real-world scenarios. The figures used by EURONCAP are based on empirical data and experience in crash testing. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate assessments of vehicle safety in crash scenarios.
marellasunny
Messages
245
Reaction score
3
EURONCAP front crash test involves crashing a car moving at 64 kph onto a deformable barrier at 40% of the total vehicle width. According to the EURONCAP website, this is equivalent to two vehicles crashing into each other at 55 kph. How did they arrive at this figure?

I presumed that the above mentioned crash-test would be equivalent to two cars moving at 32kph into each other. But, I am starting to get the idea that these relative velocity figures are better calculated by taking absorbed kinetic energy into account. Please provide me with some simple equations.

Citation from the EURONCAP website: ''By carrying out frontal impact tests at 64km/h (about 40 mph) we are simulating a car impacting a similar sized car where both cars are traveling the same speed of 55 km/h.''
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If two identical cars collide head-on with the same speed x, this is equivalent to a car crashing into an ideal wall with the same speed - the "collision front" won't move due to symmetry in the crash. With their deformable barrier, they simulate lower speeds because the car can move into the barrier a bit. I guess the numbers they use are based on experience.
 
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K