Fukashima: The Effect of Sulphuric Acid on Plutonium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Skip Hawley
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acid
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of using sulphuric acid to dissolve plutonium and other nuclear materials at the Fukushima site, similar to methods employed at Los Alamos. Current conditions at Fukushima complicate this process, as the nuclear cores are submerged under 80,000 tons of water, potentially in solid blobs or particulates. The risks associated with criticality accidents and the corrosive effects of acid on reactor vessels make this approach highly problematic. Historical context from the Chernobyl disaster indicates that removal of such materials may take decades, emphasizing the challenges of managing both solid and aqueous nuclear fuel.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear fuel types, specifically solid vs. aqueous fuel.
  • Knowledge of criticality safety and accident prevention in nuclear materials.
  • Familiarity with the chemical properties and reactions of sulphuric acid.
  • Awareness of historical nuclear incidents, particularly Chernobyl and Three Mile Island.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the chemical processes involved in dissolving plutonium with sulphuric acid.
  • Study criticality safety protocols for aqueous nuclear fuel management.
  • Examine the cleanup strategies used at Three Mile Island for insights into Fukushima's situation.
  • Investigate the long-term containment solutions for radioactive materials in nuclear disaster scenarios.
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear engineers, radiological safety professionals, environmental scientists, and policymakers involved in nuclear disaster response and remediation efforts.

Skip Hawley
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I read that at Los Alamos they cooled plutonium and then dissolved it with sulphuric acid - would this work at Fukashima? Could the Fukashima nuclear cores be turned into liquid and then pumped out?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Using acid to dissolve and draw out the nuclear material is a possibility, but there are complications.
The stuff is currently somewhere under a lake of 80,000 tons of water, possibly in blobs at the bottom of the reactor vessels or on the pedestals that hold the reactors. With the site badly contaminated and the water quite loaded with radioactive material, no one as yet has come up with a way to find the core material, much less remove it. It will probably take decades, judging by the Chernobyl example, where that material is still there, with no plans to remove it, more than 25 years after the accident.
 
In general its a lot easier to deal with solid fuel than aqueous (dissolved) fuel. And that's is a huge understatement. When dealing with solutions that contain fissile material, you have to worry about that solution accidentally going critical. Criticality accidents are significantly more common with aqueous fuel than solid fuel. For instance subtle changes could cause the fissile material to precipitate out of the solution, and accumulate until critical mass is achieved. You even have to worry about the change in geometry of the flow due to pumps breaking. When this happens you go from a vortex volume which has a high surface area to volume to cylindrical volume which has a much lower surface area to volume ratio and is more prone to going critical.

On top of that you have to consider the reactor vessel. If you going to start adding acid to dissolve the fuel, that same acid is going to eat away at the reactor vessel. And you run the risk of creating leaks or enhancing any leaks that already exist. And then after all that what do you do with the accumulated radioactive acid?

It is much easier and safer to deal with solid fuel. We were able to clean up three mile island after its core melted. And we can do the same with Fukushima.
 
Skip Hawley said:
I read that at Los Alamos they cooled plutonium and then dissolved it with sulphuric acid - would this work at Fukashima? Could the Fukashima nuclear cores be turned into liquid and then pumped out?
I would expect that Pu or Pu compound (at Los Alamos) was dissolved in some apparatus that contained the Pu solution in a vessel. The Fukushima units are huge volumes of not only U and Pu, but other transuranics, e.g., Np, Am, Cm, and fission products. The fuel may have melted or otherwise chemically reacted with seawater, so part of the fuel maybe in the form of rubble, part would be particulates, and some is in solution, or may have migrated into the cement/concrete. Attempting to dissolve the volume in the containment vessel would be problematic, and could actually increase the contamination locally.

If the majority of the fuel is in a solid mass, that mostly excludes moderation. So placing that volume in solution would raise concerns of criticality.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
20K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
916
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K