Full-Time or Part-Time Master's: Advice Needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter yenchin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Part time Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision of whether to pursue a full-time or part-time master's program in mathematics while currently employed as a lecturer. Participants explore the implications of each option on future Ph.D. applications, academic performance, and financial considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern that their undergraduate transcript is not strong and believes that a full-time master's program would allow for better academic performance compared to part-time study while working.
  • Another participant suggests that extending teaching experience may not significantly enhance Ph.D. applications, emphasizing that strong performance in the master's program is more critical.
  • Financial implications of transitioning from full-time employment to being a student are highlighted, with one participant indicating that they are financially secure enough to support themselves through tutoring.
  • A participant comments on the differing requirements for teaching positions in various educational institutions, noting that some require a master's degree for teaching subjects like physics and mathematics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether to pursue full-time or part-time studies. There are competing views regarding the value of teaching experience versus academic performance in master's programs.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying assumptions about the importance of teaching experience and financial stability, which may influence their recommendations. The discussion does not resolve the complexities of balancing work and study.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals considering graduate studies while balancing employment, particularly in academia, may find the insights relevant.

yenchin
Messages
543
Reaction score
3
Dear all, I am currently working as a lecturer at a polytechnic. I have recently been accepted into a master program (by research) in mathematics (I obtained a B.Sc (Hons) in math 2 years ago). Given that my aim is to get into a good phd program, do you think that I should:

My undergraduate transcript isn't beautiful, and I hope that I can get a better result in M.Sc, sort of to make up for my undergrads results. So naturally I would think that full time master will allow me to concentrate more on study. But several others have advised that I should keep my job (which works 8.30pm to 6pm 5 times a week) because an experience of having lecturing in a polytechnic can help to get into a good phd program. But I very much doubt that is going to help much if my grades ended up mediocre... besides having day jobs mean that I am missing out on most of the interesting courses as only a few courses are conducted in the evening.

I think I just need more opinions as to whether I should go full time to pursue my dream, or keep my current job in the hope that it will also somehow help me in the long run... Please advice. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So it sounds like you have two years experience teaching. I'm not sure that extending this to four years is going to look that much more impressive on an application - especially if it's teaching the same material.

The best qualifier for a Ph.D. program is good performance in an M.Sc. program.

What I think is more important to consider is the financial situation you'll enter into by going from full time employment to being a student again. If you're okay with this, I would pursue full time studies.
 
I spent first year or so teaching at a local prestigious high school, and another year or so lecturing at polytechnic. I have no issue with finance since I can support myself via tutoring. Thanks for your advise.
 
How nice that you can be a lecturer at a polytechnic with a bachelor's degree. The larger community colleges (in the US, pre-bachelor's only) wouldn't even consider me with a bachelor's degree. Most require a master's for any subject where it is routinely available (e.g., they will let you teach photography by either training or experience, but you must have a master's to teach physics, math, chemistry, etc.).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
877
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K