Function Differences: f and f(n) vs. (f \circ g)(n)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swapnil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between a function f and its value f(n) at a specific point n. The composition operator (f \circ g)(n) cannot be expressed as f(n) \circ g(n) because the operator acts on functions rather than their output values. Instead, the correct formulation is f(g(n)), which applies function g to n first and then applies function f to the result. This highlights the importance of understanding function notation and composition in mathematics. The conversation emphasizes the correct application of function operations to avoid confusion.
Swapnil
Messages
459
Reaction score
6
What is exactly the difference between f and f(n) and why can't we write (f \circ g)(n) as f(n) \circ g(n)?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
f is the function, f(n) is the value of the function at the point n. The ball operator \circ acts on functions, not values, so your second expression is wrong.
 
You can, however, write it as f(g(n)).
 
u can write it
no proplem...i thenk
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top