Function f Continuity at Irrational and 0: Sketch

Click For Summary
The function f is defined as f(x) = x for irrational x and f(x) = p sin(1/q) for rational x in lowest terms. It is continuous at x = 0, as the limits from both sides approach 0. While the function behaves continuously for irrational values, it is generally considered nowhere-continuous due to its behavior at rational points. The discussion highlights the complexity of continuity in relation to irrational numbers and suggests that the function's discontinuity stems from the nature of rational approximations. Overall, the consensus is that f is continuous only at x = 0 and discontinuous elsewhere.
iNCREDiBLE
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
Let f be that function defined by setting:

f(x) = x if x is irrational
= p sin(1/q) if x = p/q in lowest terms.

At what point is f continuous?


Continuous for irrational x, and for x = 0. Sketch:
p*sin(1/q) - p / q
= p(sin(1/q) -1/q)
But sin x - x = o(x^2) when x -> 0
So, for large q,
|p(sin(1/q) - 1/q)| < p (1/q)^2 = (p/q) / q

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First off, I am no master of number theory or modern algebra even. I have only observed said courses, and I have not researched my own opinion enough to give it as fact. That said, this is what I think.

Id watch my wording to prevent myself from saying continuous for irrational x, and say rather, continuous at every point x for x~irrational. the function itself is, i believe, nowhere-continuous. you might find some more searching about dirichlets function, its pretty similar.

oh, and your sketch is probably right. the function does go to 0 at x=0, and

I think the correct answer to this is that the function is continuous at x=0, since the limit of the two individual functions as x->0 from both sides is all the same value, 0. for all others, you might say that the point is continuous within the irrational space, but that in terms of the function, which lies in R, it is discontinuous.

id say it presents a problem since the sum of two irrational numbers has not been explicitly proven to be an irrational number, so there are numbers between every other number that have yet to be defined, and since many of those potentially rational numbers involves \pi (like constant multiples of eulers constant) it might bring the possibility of creating a locally continuous point in the original space. anyhow, ill shut up since I am probably totally wrong.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
989
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K