Functional Analysis vs. Complex Analysis?

Click For Summary
When choosing between Functional Analysis and Complex Analysis for an undergraduate course, Complex Analysis is often recommended as a logical follow-up to Real Analysis, making it a suitable choice for those with limited slots. Functional Analysis is considered conceptually more challenging due to its reliance on point set topology and multiple prerequisites, including both real and complex analysis. Many discussions highlight that the difficulty of these subjects can vary significantly based on the professor and textbook used. Additionally, taking Complex Analysis first can provide a solid foundation that may ease the transition into Functional Analysis later. Ultimately, both subjects are essential for a comprehensive mathematics curriculum, but the choice may depend on individual academic paths and future coursework.
Feynman's fan
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I have one slot to fill in in the coming term. The two candidates are Functional Analysis and Complex Analysis (both on the undergraduate level). Here are some questions:

1) Which one would you pick and why?

2) What other classes in the standard B.Sc. math curriculum rely on either of these two? (E.g. Advanced Probability Theory uses many results from Functional Analysis).

3) Which one is harder in your opinion? (The question is obviously subjective but I think most people would agree that, say, Real Analysis is harder than Linear Algebra, even if they have the same amount of credits and the same prerequisites.)

Any remarks are hugely appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you're pursuing a degree in Maths, then both are a must of the curricula. If you had real analysis, then complex analysis comes logically next.
 
dextercioby said:
If you're pursuing a degree in Maths, then both are a must of the curricula. If you had real analysis, then complex analysis comes logically next.

I'm going to take both eventually but I have only one free slot left in my bachelors program. How would you compare the difficulty level (assuming that Complex analysis is fully rigorous as well).
 
Functional analysis is conceptually more difficult (starts off with point set topology) and has both real and complex analysis as prerequisites.
 
I'd go with complex first.

Functional analysis is a subject that takes tons of prerequisites to be well-motivated and be done properly, although you can try to get by with less. I'd suggest doing a lot of PDE and maybe read a little about integral equations, Fourier series, and Sturm-Louiville theory, first, but maybe that's just me and my stance against too much unmotivated abstraction. You can also try to learn these subjects alongside functional analysis, and sometimes it will give you a more elegant way to think about things. Measure theory is also good to have.

As far as hardness goes, once you get to a certain point, it's often the professor or the textbook that determine hardness more than the subject does.
 
Complex analysis. Functional analysis will be much harder anyway but it will help to have taken complex analysis before you take functional analysis.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K