Functional equation f(x)^n f(a - x) = 1

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jonas Hall
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functional Scale
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The functional equation f(x)^n f(a - x) = 1 has been explored with specific boundary conditions: f(0) = 0, f(a/2) = 1, and f(a) = ∞. For n = 1, the solution f(x) = x/(a - x) satisfies these conditions. However, for n = 2, the only proposed solution is f(x) = 1, which does not meet the boundary condition f(0) = 0. The discussion suggests using a Taylor or Laurent expansion to derive potential solutions for n ≠ 1, particularly focusing on the behavior of the function around the boundaries.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of functional equations
  • Familiarity with Taylor and Laurent series expansions
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in mathematical functions
  • Experience with antisymmetric functions and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of Taylor series in solving functional equations
  • Explore Laurent series and their use in boundary value problems
  • Investigate antisymmetric functions and their role in functional equations
  • Examine specific cases of functional equations with varying n values
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying functional equations, and researchers exploring boundary conditions in mathematical modeling will benefit from this discussion.

Jonas Hall
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Hi,

In a problem I have been working on for a while now I have found that I want to find the function satisfying the functional relation

f(x)n f(a - x) = 1

for n = 1 I believe I have proven that f(x) = x/(a - x). On this page is an answer I do not quite understand. One of the prerequisits for f(x) in my problem was that f(0) = 0, f(a/2) = 1 and f(a) = ∞. I have difficulties seeing that the answer provided will satisfy f(0) = 0.

Apart from this, I have made no progress what so ever in adressing the case where n ≠ 1. In particular I have failed to find solutions for when n = 2.

The problem is this: I want to make a scale mapping where f(x) represents the value and x represents the position of the scale such that the graph of 1/xn is a straight line from positions (0, a) through ((a/2, a/2) to (a, 0), representing the values (0, ∞) through (1, 1) to (∞, 0).

How can I go about finding f(x) for n ≠ 1?

Oh, and I don't have any problem with not getting to solve it myself - I you know the answer, please just tell me!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DuckAmuck
Physics news on Phys.org
For ##n=1## the general solution is of the form ## e^{\Phi(x,a-x)}## where ##\Phi## is antisymmetric so ##f(x)f(a-x)=e^{\Phi(x,a-x)+\Phi(a-x,x)}=e^{\Phi(x,a-x)-\Phi(x,a-x)}=1##, so your equation is satisfied. After it specify the solution in the case where ##\Phi(x,a-x)=C(2x-a)##. For ##n=2## I don't see other solutions than ##f(x)=1## ...

You can assume that ##f## admits a Taylor expansion of the form ##f(x)=a_ {0}+a_{1}x+ a_{2}x^2+...## you can put this into your equation and use a math program in order to find relations with coefficients ... You will obtain an infinite system of equations to solve ...
 
f(x) = 1 does not satisty f(0) = 0. Nor does any exponential solution... Your suggestion with taylor expansions seem interesting though, I will attempt it when I have some more time.
 
ok, before I spoke about the problem in general I didn't consider the boundary condition. So in this case the exponential is not your solution ... If you want this condition you can search directly a Taylor (or better Laurent (with negative exponents)) expansion of this kind ##f(x)=a_{1}x+a_{2}x^{2}+\cdots ##
 
I would try a Laurent expansion around x=a. We know f(0)=0 so there Taylor and Laurent would be identical. This could limit the function too much.

The approach with an antisymmetric Φ should still work, if you let Φ go to -infinity if its first argument goes to zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ssnow

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K