Today, in my advanced particle physics class, the professor reminded the time-dependent perturbation theory in NRQM and derived the formula:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

##\displaystyle \frac{da_m(t)}{dt}=-i \sum_n e^{-i(E_n-E_m)} \int_{\mathbb R^3}d^3 x \phi^*_m (\vec x) V(\vec x,t) \phi_n(\vec x)##.

Then he said that this is true also for Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations which confused me. I asked him how can that be true because we assumed an equation of the form ## (H_0+V)\psi = i \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} ## and started from eigenfunctions of ## H_0 ## to do the perturbation but Dirac and Klein-Gordon equations are not of this form. His answer wasn't convincing too. So I investigated a little bit and then suddenly remembered the functional Schrodinger equation. Now I think that using the functional Schrodinger equation, we can derive a similar formula:

##\displaystyle \frac{da_m(t)}{dt}=-i \sum_n a_n(t) \int D \phi \ \psi^*_m [\phi] V[\phi] \psi_n[\phi] e^{-i(E_n-E_m)}##

and interpret the ## a_n ##s as transition amplitudes between different field configurations. Is this true?

Thanks

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Functional time-dependent perturbation theory

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**