Functions.wolfram.com accepted and published my formula for Gamma Fn

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the publication of a formula related to the Gamma function on the Wolfram Functions site. Participants explore the derivation of the formula, its components, and address issues regarding the accuracy of the published link and content.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a detailed derivation of the Gamma function using partial fraction decomposition and the Euler limit definition.
  • Another participant expresses confusion regarding the definition of a variable, ##\alpha##, in the context of the proof.
  • There are indications of editing and corrections being made to the original post, which leads to some confusion among participants about the content.
  • Some participants question the accuracy of the link provided in the email, noting discrepancies in the publication date and the formula displayed.
  • Concerns are raised about the completeness of the formula as it appears on the website, with participants noting the absence of a sum that was expected in the expression.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus regarding the accuracy of the published formula or the link provided. There are multiple competing views about the correctness of the formula and its representation on the Wolfram site.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the derivation involves several algebraic steps and assumptions, particularly regarding the treatment of variables in the context of limits and definitions. There is also an acknowledgment of potential issues with the formatting and presentation of the proof in the original post.

benorin
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,442
Reaction score
191
I sent them an email about a week or so ago with the images of the following from the solutions to exercises section 1 of my Insight Article A Path to Fractional Integral Representations of Some Special Functions:

1.9) Use partial fraction decomposition and the Euler limit definition of the Gamma function ##\Gamma ( z ) := \mathop {\lim }\limits_{\lambda \to \infty } \frac{\lambda ! \lambda ^{z - 1}}{z ( z + 1 ) \cdots ( z + \lambda - 1 ) }## to show that ##\forall z \notin {\mathbb{Z}^ - } \cup \left\{ 0 \right\} ,##
$$\Gamma ( z ) = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{\lambda \to \infty } \, \lambda ^{z - 1} \sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\lambda - 1} ( -1) ^k ( \lambda - k ) \left. _{\lambda} C_{k} \right. ( z + k )^{ - 1}$$
where ##\left. _{\lambda} C_{k} \right. ## is a binomial coefficient and ##:=## means "defined to be".
Start by finding the partial fraction decomposition of ##\tfrac{1}{{z\left( {z + 1} \right) \cdots \left( {z + \lambda - 1} \right)}}## . This is just algebra, set
$$\begin{gathered} \tfrac{1}{{z\left( {z + 1} \right) \cdots \left( {z + \lambda - 1} \right)}} = \tfrac{{{a_0}}}{z} + \tfrac{{{a_1}}}{{z + 1}} + \cdots + \tfrac{a_{\lambda - 1}}{{z + \lambda - 1}} \\ = \sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\lambda - 1} {\tfrac{{{a_k}}}{{z + k}}} \\ \end{gathered}$$
(where the second equality is just more compact notation). Multiply by the common denominator to arrive at
$$1 = \sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\lambda - 1} {{a_k}\prod\limits_{\begin{subarray}{l} m = 0 \\ m \ne k \end{subarray}} ^{\lambda - 1} {\left( {z + m} \right)} }$$
To solve this equation for the unknown coefficients ##{a_k}##, set ##z = - n##, for each ##n = 0,1, \ldots ,\lambda - 1##. Then
$$1 = \sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\lambda - 1} {{a_k}\prod\limits_{\begin{subarray}{l} m = 0 \\ m \ne k \end{subarray} }^{\lambda - 1} {\left( {m - n} \right)} } \Rightarrow {a_n} = {\left\{ {\prod\limits_{\begin{subarray}{l} m = 0 \\ m \ne n \end{subarray}} ^{\lambda - 1} {\left( {m - n} \right)} } \right\}^{ - 1}}$$
from which ##{a_n} = \tfrac{1}{{\left( { - n} \right)\left( {1 - n} \right) \cdots \left( { - 1} \right) \cdot 1 \cdot 2 \cdots \left( {\lambda - n - 1} \right)}} = \tfrac{{{{\left( { - 1} \right)}^n}}}{{n!\left( {\lambda - n - 1} \right)!}}##. Therefore the desired partial fraction decomposition is
$$\boxed{\frac{1}{{z\left( {z + 1} \right) \cdots \left( {z + \lambda - 1} \right)}} = \sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\lambda - 1} {\left[ {\frac{{{{\left( { - 1} \right)}^k}}}{{k!\left( {\lambda - k - 1} \right)!}} \cdot \frac{1}{{z + k}}} \right]} }$$
Hence from the Euler limit form of the Gamma function we have that
$$\Gamma \left( z \right): = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{\lambda \to \infty } \frac{{\lambda !{\lambda ^{z - 1}}}}{{z\left( {z + 1} \right) \cdots \left( {z + \lambda - 1} \right)}} = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{\lambda \to \infty } \left[ {\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\lambda - 1} {\tfrac{{{{\left( { - 1} \right)}^k}\lambda !{\lambda ^{z - 1}}}}{{k!\left( {\lambda - k - 1} \right)!}} \cdot \tfrac{1}{{z + k}}} } \right]$$
which I simplified to
$$\Gamma \left( z \right) = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{\lambda \to \infty } \,{\lambda ^{z - 1}}\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\lambda - 1} {{{\left( { - 1} \right)}^k}\left( {\lambda - k} \right)\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} \lambda \\ k \end{array}} \right){{\left( {z + k} \right)}^{ - 1}}} $$
*********************End*********************
I checked my email today and they said my formula was published tohttps://functions.wolfram.com/GammaBetaErf/Gamma/09/0003/
Edit: there's some kind of issue with the link I was emailed it doesn't appear to be the correct formula, I have emailed back and awaiting a response.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: quasar987, CGandC, DrClaude and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
Tried to follow through your proof but I can't understand how you define ##\alpha##.
 
Oh I'm sorry Delta2, my proof got mangled up with the proof above it pre-copy+paste, gimme a few and I'll fix it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Ehm, now the first section seems deleted, I guess you still editing...

I guess I should 've made the straightforward implication that ##\alpha## is the solution to the equation $$u^{\alpha-1}e^{-u}=u^{z-1}$$

But then again it is not so straightforward if we can treat it as constant with respect to ##u##.
 
Last edited:
Sorry @Delta2 Oh nvm, you did. Yes the first section which contained an alpha was part of the previous problem and was removed, there's more (I think) to the beginning of the second part now.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Ok , I think I understand now, seems to me you correctly calculate the ##a_k## and the rest is up to some algebraic processing of the Euler Limit of Gamma function.
 
I copy+pasted the link from the email but looking at it is it even right? Looking at the date added at the bottom of the page says 2001 so seems off.
 
  • #10
When I click on the link, my browser doesn't seem to display all the page correctly, but what I can see clearly is that $$\Gamma(z)=\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{(1)_nn^{z-1}}{(z)_n}$$. This doesn't look exactly as your formula...
 
  • #11
There should be a sum in it, see note at bottom of OP after refresh
 
  • #12
No can't see any sum anywhere in that link.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K