Fundamental noise limit for an ideal photodetector

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the fundamental noise limit for an ideal photodetector by analyzing the annihilation and generation of photons using quantum mechanics principles. The user employs ladder operators to represent the creation and annihilation processes, establishing relationships between states of particles. The uncertainty relation derived from the commutation of these operators indicates a potential misunderstanding in defining the noise limit. The user seeks clarification on the uncertainty of non-Hermitian operators in the context of their first-semester quantum mechanics project.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically photon behavior.
  • Familiarity with ladder operators and their mathematical representation.
  • Knowledge of commutation relations and uncertainty principles in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic concepts of quantum efficiency and its implications for photodetectors.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of non-Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Study the derivation and implications of the uncertainty principle in quantum systems.
  • Explore the concept of quantum efficiency in photodetectors and its impact on performance.
  • Investigate advanced topics in quantum optics related to photon detection and noise limits.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on photodetection, quantum optics, and the mathematical frameworks of quantum theory.

Dustgil
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


As the title says, I'm trying to calculate the fundamental noise limit for an ideal photodetector, by specifically looking at the rate of incidence of annihilation of photons (and subsequent excitation of conducting electrons) on the detection surface. Since I'm looking for the theoretical minimum, the quantum efficiency is 100% (taken care of by the ideal nature of the photodetector) and each incident photon excites an electron into functioning as a conducting electron.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



So, to describe the generation and annihilation of photons, we need operators. If we have a state described by n particles, then the generation operator acts on that state to create a state with n+1 particles. Likewise, the annihilation operator acts on the n state to produce a state with n-1 particles, UNLESS the n state is the state with zero particles. In that case, the operation produces the n state again, corresponding to the zero state.

This suggests the operators can be represented in the ladder operator framework. Then the properties of the operators should be the same as for all ladder operators. The two operators are then adjoints of each other, and

b|\psi_{n}\rangle=\sqrt{n+1}|\psi_{n+1}\rangle
b^{\dagger}|\psi_{n}\rangle=\sqrt{n}|\psi_{n-1}\rangle

where the nth state corresponds to the number of particles, n.

The commutator for ladder operators is 1, for example:

[b,b^{\dagger}]|n\rangle=bb^{\dagger}|n\rangle-b^{\dagger}b|n\rangle= [(n+1)-(n)]|n\rangle=|n\rangle

Then the uncertainty between the two operators is:

\sigma_{b}^{2}\sigma_{b^{\dagger}}^{2}=(\frac{1}{2i}\langle[b,b^{\dagger}]\rangle)^{2}=-\frac{1}{4}

THAT doesn't seem right...I was thinking of establishing an minimum possible uncertainty between the creation and annihilation of photons and in that way establish a minimum noise limit for photodetection. Where have I gone wrong? This is a first-semester QM project so I'm hoping I didn't bite off more than I can chew.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you define the uncertainty of non-hermitian operators like creation and annihilation operators?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K