Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Fundamental polygons and surfaces

  1. Apr 3, 2007 #1

    quasar987

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    The theorem of classification of closed surfaces says that any closed surface is homeomorphic to a fundamental polygon in the plane.

    I was wondering if any fundamental polygon can be made into a closed surface by adjoining an appropriate atlas to it.

    The topological requirements of a closed surface (compactness and connectedness) are certainly met by the fund. polygon but can we give it an atlas, and if so, is the resulting 2-manifold boundaryless?

    Sure as hell appears so to me but I want to make sure.


    Side question: Say we have a polygon with sides identified, and say that some side "a" is identified with n sides. Is n a topological invariant?

    Thx!
     
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2007
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 3, 2007 #2

    StatusX

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    A fundamental polygon is just a polygon. Do you mean a polygon with edges identified in a certain pattern? Are you asking if any polygon can have it's edges identified in such a way as to make it a closed surface? Only if it has an even number of sides. Specifically, if it has 2m sides, you can make the surface of genus m. Othewise somewhere there must be an odd number of edges identified, and here the structure will either be a boundary (if there is one edge) or a place where the structure fails to be a manifold (if there are 3 or more).
     
  4. Apr 3, 2007 #3

    quasar987

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Oops, I thought the addition of the word "fundamental" was to refer to the fact that its sides were (potentially) indentified. Why waste breath and ink on the word "fundamental" then??

    Btw - My side question is tightly related to the main question because in the proof of the classification thm, we show that any surface is homeomorphic to a polygon with pairwise identified sides. So if the answer to my side question comes out 'yes', then the main question will be answered.

    Btw² - I have edited my side question to what I really had in mind.
     
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2007
  5. Apr 3, 2007 #4

    StatusX

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Fundamental polygons are polygons associated to a surface. I've never seen this term used the other way around, to build a surface from a polygon. Maybe it is, but I would just call that a quotient space.

    As far as your side question, each (interior of an) edge belongs to an equivalence class of edges. If n of these are identified, then the result locally looks like the product of the wedge product of n half open intervals with an open interval, ie, [0,1)x(0,1) if n=1, (0,1)x(0,1) if n=2, two intersecting planes if n=4, and so on. These spaces are all non-homeomorphic, so no homeomorphism can take a point in an eq class of m edges to one with n edges unless n=m. Note this can only be a manifold if n=1 or n=2 always, and only a closed one if n=2 (which implies the total number of edges is even).
     
  6. Apr 3, 2007 #5

    quasar987

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Jesus, I know I keep saying this but how do you know so much??

    I hope that someday, when I grow up, I'll be Status X.

    And thanks too!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Fundamental polygons and surfaces
Loading...