Fundamentalists/Atheists: Thoughts on Death

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marco12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Death Thoughts
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the perspectives of fundamentalists and atheists regarding death, emphasizing the finality of existence. Participants express a range of feelings from acceptance to fear, with some finding solace in the idea that death is a release from life's worries. The conversation highlights the contrast between religious beliefs in an afterlife and the atheistic view that death signifies the end of consciousness. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards embracing life fully, given its singular nature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atheism and fundamentalism as philosophical stances.
  • Familiarity with existential concepts related to life and death.
  • Knowledge of psychological perspectives on fear and acceptance of mortality.
  • Awareness of philosophical discussions surrounding the meaning of life.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore existential philosophy, focusing on works by Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus.
  • Research psychological theories on death anxiety and coping mechanisms.
  • Investigate the role of religious beliefs in shaping attitudes towards death.
  • Examine the impact of mortality awareness on life satisfaction and decision-making.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for philosophers, psychologists, and individuals exploring their own beliefs about death and existence, particularly those interested in the intersection of atheism and existential thought.

  • #31
Maybe we evolved sleep to prepare us better for death. DMT anyone?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I'm an idealist, I don't believe in death. If you have fear of death just watch Dan Osman climbing and learn to enjoy every second of life, no matter how close the death is.
 
  • #33
Simone Ce-Ce said:
I believe man has a soul and that that soul will live on... my physical body is just a container which has an expiration date. Once my physical body has died my soul will live. I'm not so much afraid of death but how I will die... I'm hoping that i will die peacefully in my sleep...

I try not to focus on death but on the fact that I am alive! I'M ALIVE! I'M ALIVE! I'M ALIVE!

Souls, don't get me started.

binbots said:
Maybe we evolved sleep to prepare us better for death. DMT anyone?

Where'd you pluck this beauty from?
 
  • #34
Simone Ce-Ce said:
... I'm hoping that i will die peacefully in my sleep...

I want to die peacefully in my sleep too. Like grandpa did.

Not kicking and screaming like his passengers in the back seat.
 
  • #35
jarednjames said:
I find it amazing how many people subscribe to this trail of thought.

I personally see no reason for there to be a 'purpose'. I am yet to here a convincing argument for there to be one. All I hear is people saying "there must be", they never give an actual reason that goes beyond their own personal need for there to be one.
to be free.freedom from suffering which is life.of course we don't know wether its possible.but that would be a purpose.
if you believe we came from nothing then we can assume we going back there.no purpose other than what we make it.but that is a man made purpose .so its debatable wether that's worth jack ****.
nirvana which is freedom is a funny idea ,and i can't work out wether it needs a creator.or wether it can mean there is no beginning to anything(so no need for creator crap) and yet nirvana seems to suggest a end,but i have thought this can not be the case ,otherwise when we all reach it what then.we stuck at a end to everything.problem.!
however we can not get away from the fact that nirvana does give life a real purpose beyond man made purpose.because nirvana is a state if you like or something .that is not created by us.and it has meaning in that all people want to be free.
however if you look into it ,it is hard not to always come back to nothing.as though nirvana is actaully nothing.
because you can not define or understand nirvana not even slightly,you can not imagine it.
so its easy to say what isn't nirvana in a way,but this is a reduction or elimination. process which seems to lead to nothing.very annoying.
 
  • #36
DaveC426913 said:
Which as a rationale for some to have children. A form of immortality.

"I don't want to achieve immortality through my work... I want to achieve it through not dying."
Woody Allen​

For myself... I know I have a finite duration; like pretty much everything else. This doesn't bother me. I know it doesn't bother me because about ten years ago I was given about six months to live -- a preliminary tentative diagnosis which turned out to be incorrect. I did not freak out at the time and I don't expect to freak out if I get a more reliable early indicator of time of death either. I enjoy living and want to keep doing it; but I can't really imagine it going on forever. I think that really would make things in the here and now pointless.

I really don't get the people who say that nothing matters if you are going to die eventually. I consider it to be just the reverse.

Cheers -- sylas
 
  • #37
binbots said:
Maybe we evolved sleep to prepare us better for death. DMT anyone?

I have done some research on DMT, and let me tell you this chemical is fascinating. I understand that when we die, our brain is flooded by DMT and also when we sleep the brain releases DMT. I read a theory that maybe DMT is a connection of different dimensions for example when we dream, we might be actually living in different dimensions and when we die, perhaps we go to another dimension/dream forever or until we die again.

I didnt mean to go off-topic or propose anything without much evidence, but when I read this theory I found it very interesting...
 
  • #38
Marco12 said:
I read a theory that maybe DMT is a connection of different dimensions for example when we dream, we might be actually living in different dimensions and when we die, perhaps we go to another dimension/dream forever or until we die again.

I didnt mean to go off-topic or propose anything without much evidence, but when I read this theory I found it very interesting...

I don't think we want to go in this direction. This is far too vague and speculative, even for the Philosophy forum.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
11K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
5K