Fungus Discovered in Rainforest May Offer New Source of Green Energy

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential of a newly discovered fungus in the rainforest that produces diesel compounds, exploring its implications for green energy production. Participants examine the efficiency and practicality of using this fungus compared to traditional methods of energy production, including the burning of biomass.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the efficiency of using the fungus for fuel production, arguing that the process involves multiple steps and losses, suggesting that burning biomass directly may be more efficient.
  • Others propose that as long as the fungus utilizes cellulose waste, which is often considered a negative by-product of agriculture, the process may not be inefficient.
  • A participant raises concerns about the potential ecological consequences of genetically modifying the fungus, noting its ubiquity and ability to live in trees.
  • There is mention of a patent granted to Montana State University for the fungus, but details on its hydrocarbon production and the processes involved remain unclear.
  • Some participants discuss the energy cycle and the possibility of using waste materials in a more beneficial way, questioning the assumptions about net energy loss.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; there are competing views regarding the efficiency and practicality of using the fungus for energy production versus traditional biomass burning methods.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the energy cycle, the specifics of hydrocarbon production, and the ecological implications of potential genetic modifications to the fungus.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
2,664
Competition for algae?

(PhysOrg.com) -- A unique fungus that makes diesel compounds has been discovered living in trees in the rainforest, according to a paper published in the November issue of Microbiology. The fungus is potentially a totally new source of green energy and scientists are now working to develop its fuel producing potential...
http://www.physorg.com/news144958975.html
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
A fungus can't photosynthesize so there is inevitably an extra set of steps/losses.
Sunlight -> plant -> dead plant -> fungus -> fuel

Wouldn't you simply be better off simply burning the straw/woodpulp/etc waste material rather than feeding it to a fungus to make diesel?
 
mgb_phys said:
A fungus can't photosynthesize so there is inevitably an extra set of steps/losses.
Sunlight -> plant -> dead plant -> fungus -> fuel

Wouldn't you simply be better off simply burning the straw/woodpulp/etc waste material rather than feeding it to a fungus to make diesel?

I didn't think about photosynthesis. Still, we can't burn straw or wood in a diesel engine.
 
Ivan Seeking said:
I didn't think about photosynthesis. Still, we can't burn straw or wood in a diesel engine.
No, you probably end up burning it to heat the greenhouses that the fungi is growing in!

No doubt some set of EPA rules, tax credits and carbon tax will mean it makes financial sense to heat your pulp mill with coal/oil while turning wood pulp into diesel with fungus.

Still, not as daft as using nuclear reactors in Afghanistan to make jet fuel from atmospheric CO2 and sewage.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/31/darpa_portable_fuel_reactors/print.html
 
mgb_phys said:
No, you probably end up burning it to heat the greenhouses that the fungi is growing in!

That may be true. While a detailed study of the energy cycle would seem to be in order, I don't think we can assume that it would be a net negative.
 
I've been doing more digging on this. Montana State University has been granted a patent on the fungus (what?!) but will sell licenses for its use.

So far, no description of the breakdown of hydrocarbon by-products, nor rate of production, nor of feedback mechanisms that might regulate or limit the digestion of cellulose. No description yet of a process to turn the off-gassed hydrocarbons into a liquid burnable fuel.
 
I don't see the problem here. There is presumably some fungus, that in the process of making more fungi turns cellulous rich tree droppings into simple liquid C-H compounds suitable for burning.
 
Not a problem, just questions. According to this publication, VOCs in the headspace above a sample grown on agar in a limited oxygen environment totaled about 80 ppm after 18 days.

http://mic.sgmjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/154/11/3319

I guess the operative word here should be "potential". It might be tempting to genetically modify the fungus to boost its ability to digest wood, but that might not be a good idea because this family of fungus is ubiquitous and can live inside living trees. If that should escape to the wild, there could be serious consequences involving forestry and food-crops.
 
mgb_phys said:
A fungus can't photosynthesize so there is inevitably an extra set of steps/losses.
Sunlight -> plant -> dead plant -> fungus -> fuel

Wouldn't you simply be better off simply burning the straw/woodpulp/etc waste material rather than feeding it to a fungus to make diesel?

More like:

Code:
Sunlight -> | plant -> food
            | plant -> waste -> fungus -> fuel

As long as the starting point for fuel production is cellulose waste that is currently considered as a negative good by-product of agriculture, there is no inefficiency here. As for burning this waste to produce power, it is a waste of good farmland. To make it a high-BTU fuel that can be burned to produce high-pressure steam, you have to dry it. It would be nice to be able to economically truck the waste to a nearby desert for drying. What kills that approach is that you have to truck it out of the desert for burning. Electrical generating plants need plenty of water. Some for making into steam, lots more for cooling the condensers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
13K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
455
Replies
4
Views
4K