Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the upcoming Guru awards, specifically the Funniest Member category. Participants are nominating members they find humorous and sharing thoughts on past winners and the nature of the awards.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Meta-discussion
Main Points Raised
- Some participants suggest nominees for the Funniest Member award, including BobG, jimmysnider, Artman, and MIH.
- Several members express their desire not to be considered for the award, with some humorously referencing fears of public perception.
- There is mention of past winners, such as tribdog and Cyrus, and discussions about the implications of winning, including disappearing acts.
- Participants discuss the possibility of other awards, such as a gloomiest member competition and a most conceited award.
- Some members reflect on the qualifications for nominations, including the status of retired staff and mentors.
- Humor is a central theme, with jokes about the volcano and flammability, as well as playful banter about the nature of nominations.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
There is no clear consensus on who should be nominated or the rules surrounding the awards, as multiple competing views and humorous exchanges remain throughout the discussion.
Contextual Notes
Participants express uncertainty about the rules of the awards, including whether a member can win multiple times and the eligibility of certain members based on their status.
Who May Find This Useful
Members interested in community engagement, humor, and the dynamics of online awards may find this discussion relevant.