Future Nobel laureates in physics?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on potential Nobel Prize winners in Physics for 2021 and beyond, highlighting key figures and areas of research. Notable candidates include John Perdew, recognized for his contributions to density functional theory (DFT), and Lu Jeu Sham, known for his work on the Kohn-Sham equation. The conversation also revisits predictions about quantum communication technology, mentioning Alain Aspect, John Clauser, and Anton Zeilinger as strong contenders. Future possibilities for Nobel recognition include research on the mass gap between neutron stars and black holes through gravitational waves, as well as anomalies in muon g-2 and b-physics, which may take over a decade to validate. Additionally, breakthroughs in high-temperature superconductors or the discovery of a room-temperature superconductor could also be significant factors for future awards.
Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
Which physicists are most likely to win the Nobel Prize in physics in 2021 and in the coming years?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here were three 2020 predictions. While not an exact match, the Nobel Prize was awarded in the field of black holes, the first group.
Possibilities include John Perdew, whose work at multiple institutions has made him one of the most cited scientists on DFT and in physics, or Lu Jeu Sham from UC San Diego, who worked with the aforementioned Kohn on the Kohn-Sham equation, a specialized form of DFT widely used in materials science and quantum chemistry.
[...]
We have previously predicted that scientists working on quantum communication technology might get the nod from the Committee. In particular, we mentioned the trio of Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger
Possible future results:

Exploring the mass gap between neutron stars and black holes - via gravitational waves and possibly electromagnetic observations - could lead to a prize, too. B modes in the cosmic microwave background would be a candidate.

If muon g-2 is a real anomaly and gets confirmed it has a chance. The b-physics anomalies have a chance if they are real. Both would likely be 10+ years in the future because the interpretation isn't easy.

A good model for high temperature superconductors would likely get a prize. Discovering a useful room-temperature superconductor would be a candidate, too.
 
Anton Zeilinger. plane @ simple
 
Magic angle graphene?
Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, Allan MacDonald and Rafi Bistritzer
 
To some degree, this thread is inspired by PF user erobz's thread "Why do we spend so much time learning grammar in the public school system?" That's why I made a title to this thread that paralleled the title of erobz's thread. I totally disagree with erobz. I created this thread because the curriculum of grammar at Universities is a totally distinct topic from the topic of the curriculum of grammar in public schools. I have noticed that the English grammar of many ( perhaps most)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
842
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K