I Gaia vs DESI: Comparing Largest Star Maps Ever

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hillwalker01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Map Star Universe
AI Thread Summary
Gaia and DESI have produced two distinct types of astronomical maps, each significant in its own right. Gaia focuses on mapping individual stars primarily within the Milky Way, providing detailed insights into our galaxy's structure. In contrast, DESI surveys galaxies as whole entities, creating a comprehensive map of the large-scale universe. While Gaia offers depth within our galaxy, DESI provides a broader perspective on cosmic structures. Together, they enhance our understanding of the universe by complementing each other's data and methodologies.
Hillwalker01
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Comparison between star maps created by ESA's Gaia observatory and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI)
I've read that ESA's Gaia space observatory has created the "richest map of our galaxy (and beyond)" https://www.esa.int/Science_Explora...tes_richest_star_map_of_our_Galaxy_and_beyond

Meanwhile, it's been widely reported tat the "The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI)" survey has constructed the "most comprehensive (or 'largest') map of the universe yet". E.g. https://www.wired.com/story/astrophysicists-release-the-biggest-map-of-the-universe-yet/

This isn't a "who's right?" or "which is better?" question ... I understand that these are very different instruments/surveys, using different methods, and no doubt have created very different types of 'map' (both incredibly impressive).

But can anyone give a layman's explanation of how these two surveys compare, how they differ, in what sense they can both lay claim to having produced the 'largest star map ever', how their data complement each other, and contribute differently to our understanding of the universe?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
This is a very simple distinction, really.
GAIA looks at individual stars - mostly in our galaxy, but to lesser extent also in its closest neighbourhood. It's mapping the Milky Way.
DESI looks at galaxies, treated as individual objects (i.e. not resolved into component stars). It's mapping the large-scale universe.
In a way, it's like making the best map there is of a city, that doesn't concern itself with what lies beyond. And another best map there is of the globe, that doesn't have the resolution to zoom in on individual cities.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke, stefan r and Hillwalker01
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top