Galilean transform of the Laplacian

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the transformation of the Laplacian under Galilean transformations, specifically in the context of the wave equation's invariance. The original poster is attempting to understand how the Laplacian changes when moving from one inertial frame to another.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the transformation of the Laplacian by considering the second derivative with respect to the transformed coordinates. Some participants question the steps taken in this derivation, particularly the transition between certain mathematical expressions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants seeking clarification on the mathematical steps involved in the transformation. There is a suggestion that the invariance may depend on the function applied to the Laplacian, indicating a potential direction for further exploration.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the need to consider the d'Alembertian in the context of the wave equation, which may imply additional considerations regarding the nature of the wave function and its transformation.

cartonn30gel
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm trying to show that the wave equation is not invariant under Galilean transform. To do that I need to figure out how the Laplacian transforms from S to S'. I seem to have trouble understanding why the laplacian actually changes.

Homework Equations



x'=x-vt, t'=t

The Attempt at a Solution



Just consider the second derivative wrt x in cartesian coordinates:

\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x'^2}=\frac{\partial}{\partial x'} \frac{\partial}{\partial x'} = (\frac{\partial x}{\partial x'} \frac{\partial}{\partial x}) (\frac{\partial x}{\partial x'} \frac{\partial}{\partial x}) = \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \frac{\partial}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}

So if you do the same for all three components, it looks like the Laplacian just transforms as it is. But I know that this is not right. Any help??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you go from your 3rd step to the 4th one?
 
Matterwave said:
How did you go from your 3rd step to the 4th one?

\frac{\partial x}{\partial x'} = 1 since x'=x-vt according to Lorentz transform, and v is constant since we are talking about an inertial reference frame.
 
Can anybody help?
 
the Laplacian doesn't change the invariance comes from the function you apply it to i.e. from f(x,t) -> f(x',t')

and aren't you supposed to be considering the d'Alembertian for a wave equation
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K