Gamma Function and the Euler-Mascheroni Constant

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the gamma function and its relation to the Euler-Mascheroni constant, sparked by an individual's exploration during exam preparation. They discovered a unique relation using the product expansion of the multiplicative inverse and sought confirmation from others. The conversation also touched on the digamma function and its connection to the gamma function, particularly through l'Hôpital's rule. Additionally, there was an inquiry about extending products over continuous intervals, leading to the mention of Bigeometric Calculus and the concept of product integrals. Overall, the thread highlights mathematical exploration and the sharing of lesser-known connections within advanced calculus.
epr1990
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I was taking a break from studying from my real analysis, electrodynamics, and nuclear physics exams this week, and, being a math-phile, I decided to play around with the gamma-function for some reason. Anyway, I used the common product expansion of the multiplicative inverse, and I arrived at a very simple but interesting relation to the exact value of the Euler-Mascheroni Constant. I searched the internet and couldn't seem to find anything similar to what I did. So, I was wondering if anyone else has seen anything like the result that I have attached as a .pdf file.


Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Now that I think about it, doesn't it basically just follow from l'Hospitals rule and

\Gamma^\prime(1) = \Psi(1) = \gamma
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I didn't even think to look at digamma, but it seems that as usual, you are indeed correct. It follows straight from a series representation for it. Basically, the last line in my analysis is almost exactly this

ψ(x+1)=-γ+∑(1/k-1/(x+k))
 
Actually, it follows immediately if you change the LHS of the last line to the equivalent

-(log(gamma(1+s))-log(gamma(1))/s

since log(gamma(1))=log(1)=0 and the digamma function ψ is defined to be the logarithmic derivative of the gamma function, so that under the limit as s ->0 this is precisely -ψ(1). Thanks again!
 
Still, it's a pretty neat equation that I haven't seen before. I'm happy you've made this thread!
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Yea I think so too. This is a little bit off topic, but, it was also my reason for looking at the properties of the gamma function. Have you seen any theory on extending a product over a continuous interval, as is done with the sum to create the integral?

I have tried to develop an approach analogous to that of the limiting case of a Riemann sum to no avail. I have no idea what this would describe geometrically, but that's just another obstacle. Anyway, I have never seen or heard of anyone doing anything like that, but I would think that you should be able to construct such a thing for any binary operation defined on a complete and compact set. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.
 
Just in case anyone wanted to know, I found a lot about it. It's called Bigeometric (or Multiplicative) Calculus.
 
The so called product integral was developed in 1887 by Volterra according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_integral

And here is the page for multiplicative calculus, just in case anyone is interested:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplicative_calculus
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
19K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K