Gas conductance through tube at low pressure

In summary, the conversation discusses the design of a vacuum chamber with a controllable tube to achieve a constant rate of pressure change inside the chamber. The use of PV=nRT and Poiseuille's law for calculating the required tube radius is questioned, and a different equation is suggested for the low pressure regime. It is determined that a control system with a pressure sensor and flow control valve will be necessary for this setup.
  • #1
soothsayer
423
5
I have a vacuum chamber of volume V connected to a vacuum pump via a tube of radius R and length L, and I want to design this "tube" such that R can be controlled in order to provide a constant rate of pressure change inside of the chamber of 2.5 mbar/sec, from atmosphere down to ~0.5mbar. Assume that pumping speed is infinite, so my flow rate is entirely limited by the conductance of my adjustable tube.

At the beginning of chamber pumpdown, I feel like I should be able to apply a combination of PV=nRT and Poiseuille's law to convert my 2.5mbar rate of pressure change into a desired flow rate, and then into an effective tube radius. When I do this, I get a result that feels pretty intuitive based on my experience. (Does this seem like a valid calculation to anyone else or have I already made an error here?)

But nearing the end of the pumpdown process, I suspect I can no longer apply Poiseuille's law in the same way since I no longer have laminar gas flow. When I try to apply the same equations the same way I get a resulting effective radius that is much smaller than would make sense. Is there a different equation I can use to calculate a required tube radius in this low pressure regime? Does it even make sense to be trying to calculate this when my desired change in pressure (2.5mbar/s) is larger than my chamber pressure (0.5mbar)? It doesn't feel like I can treat pressure over time as linear here.

Any advice for tackling this problem would be appreciated!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
This sketch is my understanding of your problem:
Vacuum.jpg

The Poiseuille equation applies to the incompressible laminar flow of a Newtonian fluid. Air is Newtonian, the Reynolds number needs to calculated to find if the flow is laminar, and this flow is definitely not incompressible.

Your goal is to get a constant rate of pressure decrease in the vacuum chamber. That requires a constant mass flow rate out of the chamber. At the start, the pressure (and the density) in the chamber is high, and the pressure drop is high. Near the end, the pressure (and the density) in the chamber is low, and the pressure drop is low. Regardless of whether the flow in the tube is laminar or turbulent, the mass flow rate will be a function of chamber gas density and pressure drop in the tube. The mass flow rate will be high at the beginning, and decrease as the pressure in the vacuum chamber decreases.

A fixed restriction, whether a tube or an orifice, will not get you a constant rate of pressure decrease in the vacuum chamber. Unless somebody has a better idea, I think you will need some sort of control system. A pressure transmitter, ramp controller, and air flow control valve would do what you want.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveE
  • #3
soothsayer said:
I have a vacuum chamber of volume V connected to a vacuum pump via a tube of radius R and length L, and I want to design this "tube" such that R can be controlled in order to provide a constant rate of pressure change inside of the chamber of 2.5 mbar/sec, from atmosphere down to ~0.5mbar. Assume that pumping speed is infinite, so my flow rate is entirely limited by the conductance of my adjustable tube.

At the beginning of chamber pumpdown, I feel like I should be able to apply a combination of PV=nRT and Poiseuille's law to convert my 2.5mbar rate of pressure change into a desired flow rate, and then into an effective tube radius. When I do this, I get a result that feels pretty intuitive based on my experience. (Does this seem like a valid calculation to anyone else or have I already made an error here?)

But nearing the end of the pumpdown process, I suspect I can no longer apply Poiseuille's law in the same way since I no longer have laminar gas flow. When I try to apply the same equations the same way I get a resulting effective radius that is much smaller than would make sense. Is there a different equation I can use to calculate a required tube radius in this low pressure regime? Does it even make sense to be trying to calculate this when my desired change in pressure (2.5mbar/s) is larger than my chamber pressure (0.5mbar)? It doesn't feel like I can treat pressure over time as linear here.

Any advice for tackling this problem would be appreciated!
Hi There!

This is a super fun problem. Are you still looking for help?

Check out the PDF by Genick Bar-Meir, "Fundamentals of Compressible Fluid Mechanics"

Let me know if you need help.
 
  • Informative
Likes berkeman
  • #4
jrmichler said:
I think you will need some sort of control system. A pressure transmitter, ramp controller, and air flow control valve would do what you want.
Yep. This!
You will absolutely have to have a some flow control "valve" that can be adjusted. You will also need a pressure sensor to measure what you ultimately want. The rest is just a (nonlinear) control system to make it work.
 

Similar threads

  • General Engineering
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • General Engineering
Replies
15
Views
472
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Engineering
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • General Engineering
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • Classical Physics
5
Replies
160
Views
6K
Back
Top