Gauss-Jordan Elimination algorithm steps

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the steps involved in the Gauss-Jordan Elimination algorithm, specifically addressing the sequence of row operations required to achieve Reduced Row Echelon Form (RREF). Participants clarify that while multiple sequences of operations can yield the correct RREF, adherence to a specific method may be necessary, particularly in an academic context. The algorithm involves two main phases: first, transforming the matrix from the top down to create pivots, and second, adjusting the rows from the bottom up to ensure all values above the pivots are zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix operations and row transformations
  • Familiarity with the concept of pivots in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of Reduced Row Echelon Form (RREF)
  • Basic skills in algorithmic problem-solving
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the detailed steps of the Gauss-Jordan Elimination algorithm
  • Practice solving systems of equations using matrix row operations
  • Explore the implications of different row operation sequences on RREF outcomes
  • Learn about the application of Gauss-Jordan Elimination in programming and computational contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students in computer science or mathematics, educators teaching linear algebra, and anyone interested in mastering matrix operations and algorithms for solving systems of equations.

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Row operations
For this problem,
1681622151988.png

1681622233243.png

For (i) the solution is,
1681622408027.png

However, I am somewhat confused how to follow the steps of the Gauss-Jordan Elimination algorithm from there. Do I have to eliminate the coefficients from ##x_2## and ##x_3## respectively from row 1 and the -5 coefficient from row 2 in the exact order that they did?

For example, could I do for the First row ##R_1 - R_2## which would transform the first row to ##(1~0~7~:~17)## then do row operations to make the top two values in the third column to become zero?

Thank you for any help.

Many thanks!
Many thanks!
 

Attachments

  • 1681622261283.png
    1681622261283.png
    18.8 KB · Views: 141
  • 1681622361039.png
    1681622361039.png
    19.2 KB · Views: 150
Physics news on Phys.org
ChiralSuperfields said:
For this problem,
View attachment 324955
View attachment 324956
For (i) the solution is,
View attachment 324959
However, I am somewhat confused how to follow the steps of the Gauss-Jordan Elimination algorithm from there. Do I have to eliminate the coefficients from ##x_2## and ##x_3## respectively from row 1 and the -5 coefficient from row 2 in the exact order that they did?
Yes (I guess).

ChiralSuperfields said:
For example, could I do for the First row ##R_1 - R_2## which would transform the first row to ##(1~0~7~:~17)## then do row operations to make the top two values in the third column to become zero?
It will lead to the correct answer but (I guess) it is probably not what is required.

There are many possible sequences of row operations which would give the correct RREF. But from the wording in the question, it appears you are required to use the specific approach as shown in the model answer.

This would make sense if, for example, it’s part of a computer-science course where you might be required to write some code for this.

The algorithm used in the model answer is, in essence, this:

1. From the top down, repeat for each Row:

a) if needed, multiply the Row so that its left-most non-zero entry is set to 1; this is the Pivot for this Row;

b) add/subtract multiples of the Row from the rows beneath it, to make all values below the Pivot equal to zero.

You end up with 1s in the pivot positions and all zeroes to the left of the pivots.

2. From the bottom up, repeat for each Row:

add/subtract multiples of the Row from the rows above it, to make all values above the Row’s pivot equal to zero.

You end up with RREF.

That's a non-rigorous description.

Note, in this question, no rows initially have leading zeroes. If they did, the initial step would have been to re-order the rows so that the rows with most leading zeroes are nearest the bottom.

Edit - typo's.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016 and DrClaude

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K