Gauss' Theorem for gravitational force

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Gauss' Theorem to gravitational force, specifically addressing the divergence of the gravitational field, denoted as \(\vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{g}\). The initial claim that this divergence is zero is corrected by referencing the proper expression, \(\vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{g} = -4\pi G\sum_{i=0}^n m_i \delta^3(\vec{r} - \vec{r_i})\), which accounts for point masses. Participants emphasize the importance of using spherical coordinates and correctly applying derivatives when calculating the divergence of the gravitational field. The discussion highlights common misconceptions in vector calculus as applied to gravitational fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' Theorem in vector calculus
  • Familiarity with gravitational fields and the concept of divergence
  • Knowledge of Dirac delta functions in physics
  • Proficiency in spherical coordinates for gravitational calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Gauss' Law for gravity in detail
  • Learn about the application of Dirac delta functions in gravitational fields
  • Explore vector calculus techniques, particularly in spherical coordinates
  • Review Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics" for insights on vector calculus applications
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on gravitational theory, vector calculus, and mathematical physics. This discussion is also beneficial for educators teaching advanced physics concepts.

coki2000
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I wonder that the gauss' theorem for gravitational force area.

\int\int_S \vec{g}\hat{n}dS=-4\pi GM=\int\int\int_V \vec{\nabla}\stackrel{\rightarrow}{g}dV

\vec{g}=-G\frac{M}{r^2}\hat{r}\Rightarrow\hat{r}=\frac{\vec{r}}{r}\Rightarrow\vec{g}=-G\frac{M}{r^3}\vec{r}

for \vec{r}=x\hat{x}+y\hat{y}+z\hat{z} and r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}

\vec{\nabla}\vec{g}=-\frac{\partial}{\partial x}G\frac{M}{r^3}x-\frac{\partial }{\partial y}G\frac{M}{r^3}y-\frac{\partial }{\partial z}G\frac{M}{r^3}z=0

The divergence of g has 0 so \int\int_S\vec{g}\hat{n}dS=0

Where do I wrong please help me.Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Uh, I'm not sure I understand all of your equations there. By \vec{\nabla}\vec{g}, did you mean, \vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{g}?

If so, then you should know that \vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{g} is not zero. The correct expression is,

\vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{g} = -4\pi G\sum_{i=0}^n m_i \delta^3(\vec{r} - \vec{r_i})

When dealing witih point masses, the divergence of the gravitational field is a sum of Dirac delta functions. That way when you take the surface integral of the gravitational field, the volume integral that you have to take on the right hand side will give you 4\pi G times the sum of the point masses inside the surface of integration. This is actually a very common error, and Griffiths' E&M book discusses it in the first chapter on vector calculus.

Hope that helps!
 
Last edited:
coki2000 said:
Hello,
I wonder that the gauss' theorem for gravitational force area.

\int\int_S \vec{g}\hat{n}dS=-4\pi GM=\int\int\int_V \vec{\nabla}\stackrel{\rightarrow}{g}dV

\vec{g}=-G\frac{M}{r^2}\hat{r}\Rightarrow\hat{r}=\frac{\vec{r}}{r}\Rightarrow\vec{g}=-G\frac{M}{r^3}\vec{r}

for \vec{r}=x\hat{x}+y\hat{y}+z\hat{z} and r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}

\vec{\nabla}\vec{g}=-\frac{\partial}{\partial x}G\frac{M}{r^3}x-\frac{\partial }{\partial y}G\frac{M}{r^3}y-\frac{\partial }{\partial z}G\frac{M}{r^3}z=0

The divergence of g has 0 so \int\int_S\vec{g}\hat{n}dS=0

Where do I wrong please help me.Thanks.

You seem to use
\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \frac{1}{r^3} = 0
and similarly for the derivatives with respect to y and z. That's not the case!
 
you pointed out in your derivation what r was equal to but did not use it when you were taking the partial I think.
 
arunma said:
Uh, I'm not sure I understand all of your equations there. By \vec{\nabla}\vec{g}, did you mean, \vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{g}?

If so, then you should know that \vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{g} is not zero. The correct expression is,

\vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{g} = -4\pi G\sum_{i=0}^n m_i \delta^3(\vec{r} - \vec{r_i})

Hope that helps!
Yes,\vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{g} I mean. Thanks for your helps but I found that \vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{g} is zero.Let's I show it,

\vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{g}=-GM(\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\frac{x}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{3/2}}+\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\frac{y}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{3/2}}+\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\frac{z}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{3/2}})

Now I calculate first partial derivative after generalize the other derivatives.

-GM\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\frac{x}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{3/2}}=-GM\frac{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{3/2}-3x^2(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{1/2}}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^3}
Then
\vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{g}=-GM(\frac{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{3/2}-3x^2(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{1/2}}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^3}+\frac{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{3/2}-3y^2(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{1/2}}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^3}+\frac{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{3/2}-3z^2(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{1/2}}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^3})

\vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{g}=-GM(\frac{3(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{3/2}-3(x^2+y^2+z^2)(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{1/2}}{(x^2+y^2+z^2)^3})=0

Where did I make wrong?I wonder it.Thanks.
 
What happens when x = y = z = 0? :wink:
 
Physically speaking, the divergence of g should depend upon mass density. There is a monopole source of gravity...mass!

Also, as a suggestion...work in spherical coordinates.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
671
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K