Gauss's law, nucleus, potential proton due to other protons

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the application of Gauss's law to calculate the electric field due to protons in a nucleus. The user derives the electric field expression as ##E=(z-1)e r/4\pi R^{3}##, where ##z## represents the number of protons and ##R## is the nucleus radius. The confusion arises from the book's formulation, which includes a factor of ##r^{2}## on the left-hand side, leading to a misunderstanding of the relationship between electric field and potential. The user also expresses uncertainty regarding the use of ##\varepsilon_o## for vacuum permittivity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's law and its mathematical formulation
  • Familiarity with electric field concepts and charge density calculations
  • Knowledge of spherical charge distributions in electrostatics
  • Basic grasp of potential energy in electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from charge distributions using Gauss's law
  • Learn about the relationship between electric field strength and electric potential
  • Explore examples of spherical charge distributions in electrostatics
  • Review the concept of permittivity in different media, focusing on vacuum permittivity ##\varepsilon_o##
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying electrostatics and nuclear physics, as well as anyone seeking to clarify the application of Gauss's law in complex charge distributions.

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
I'm a little out of touch with this stuff , but I'm really not getting it..

So my book is considering: in a nucleus of ##z## protons, consider one proton in spherical charge distribution to other protons.

So ## \rho = (z-1)e/(4/3) \pi R^{3}##, where ##R## is the radius of the nucleus, is the charge density. (this is fine)

I have for Gauss's law:

##\int E.d\vec{A} = Q_{enclosed}/\Sigma_{0}##,

So I get ##E.4\pi r^{2}=\rho (4/3) \pi r^{3} / \Sigma_{0}##
##=>## ##E=(z-1)e r/4\pi R^{3}##

Whereas my book has ##q/4 \pi \Sigma_{0} r= (4/3) \pi r^{3} \rho/4 \pi \Sigma_{0}r=(z-1)e/4 \pi \Sigma_{0}(r^{2}/R^{3}##,

I don't understand the far LHS of this? But anyway I'm a factor ##r## out, I have no idea how the book gets ##r^{2}##,

your assistance is greatly appreciated, thank you !
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
( I hope it's OK with you if I use ##\varepsilon_o## for the permittivity of the vacuum. With your symbol, I keep wondering what gets summed :wink:)

$${1\over 4 \pi \varepsilon_o}\; {q\over r} $$ looks more like a potential, not an electric field strength. That would explain the factor r.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K