Gay marriage nearly legalised in NZ

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter StevieTNZ
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread discusses the legalization of gay marriage in New Zealand, focusing on the political process involved, reactions from various participants, and comparisons to the situation in Florida regarding gay rights. The scope includes political, social, and personal perspectives on the issue.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express excitement about the progress in New Zealand towards legalizing gay marriage, noting the recent vote and its implications.
  • Others reflect on the broader societal attitudes towards gay rights, particularly in conservative regions like Florida, suggesting that change may come with time and education.
  • There are discussions about the necessity of recognizing the distinction between rights and preferential treatment in the context of civil unions and marriage rights.
  • Some participants question the relevance of stating one's sexual orientation when discussing support for gay marriage, suggesting it should not be a prerequisite for advocacy.
  • Concerns are raised about the persistence of outdated beliefs regarding gay rights, with some participants arguing that empathy and understanding are crucial for societal progress.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express support for the legalization of gay marriage in New Zealand, but there are competing views regarding the situation in Florida and the nature of support for gay rights. The discussion remains unresolved on several points, particularly regarding the implications of sexual orientation in advocacy.

Contextual Notes

Some statements reflect personal experiences and regional attitudes, highlighting the complexity of public opinion on gay rights. The discussion includes references to political systems and societal norms that may not be universally applicable.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in social justice, LGBTQ+ rights, and political processes related to marriage equality may find the perspectives shared in this discussion relevant.

StevieTNZ
Messages
1,944
Reaction score
837
Physics news on Phys.org
Excellent!
I don't know anything about your political system, but it appears from the link that you're making a good transition to reality. Although I'm straight, it churns my bile that gays and transgenders aren't allotted equal rights in some jurisdictions. Anyone who feels threatened by their happiness is too insecure to hold an opinion.
 
Wonderful! I hope the complete legalization happens soon.
 
Heard on the radio this morning it passed 77 to 44.

I'm not gay but I agree 100% with what Danger said.
 
http://inthehouse.co.nz/node/18213

and LOL at the comments made at 1:16 - http://inthehouse.co.nz/node/18214

and the final vote: http://inthehouse.co.nz/node/18232
 
Last edited by a moderator:
StevieTNZ said:
http://inthehouse.co.nz/node/18213

and LOL at the comments made at 1:16 - http://inthehouse.co.nz/node/18214

and the final vote: http://inthehouse.co.nz/node/18232

The first link mentions other discrimination in other countries.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i do not even understand why it's on law books.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Good news! NZ is on the right track!

Maybe one day, we all are.

But that requires a lot of educational work.
 
  • #10
I hope Florida goes in that direction. I'm straight but support gay rights.
 
  • #11
krash661 said:
i do not even understand why it's on law books.

Would you be able to elaborate on that statement, please?
 
  • #12
Julio R said:
I hope Florida goes in that direction. I'm straight but support gay rights.

I'm in Florida too. I heard from my friend that the Florida constitution was actually amended to make gay marriage invalid here. People voted to not allow gays the same rights as everyone else. I bet if there was another vote, the voters would probably be in favor of gay marriage. It's just a matter of time. I don't know why people are clinging to their antiquated beliefs as if the push for gay marriage is going to go away.

And it's dumb how some people will think that you must be gay to be supporting gay marriage. I noticed you added a caveat that you're not gay. That just shows their selfishness. Not only do they not care if other people get rights, but they can't understand why someone who isn't a part of an oppressed group would care about that group.
 
  • #13
leroyjenkens said:
I'm in Florida too. I heard from my friend that the Florida constitution was actually amended to make gay marriage invalid here. People voted to not allow gays the same rights as everyone else. I bet if there was another vote, the voters would probably be in favor of gay marriage. It's just a matter of time. I don't know why people are clinging to their antiquated beliefs as if the push for gay marriage is going to go away.

And it's dumb how some people will think that you must be gay to be supporting gay marriage. I noticed you added a caveat that you're not gay. That just shows their selfishness. Not only do they not care if other people get rights, but they can't understand why someone who isn't a part of an oppressed group would care about that group.
Florida is a red state (conservative), and therefore not too open to gay rights.
 
  • #14
Evo said:
Florida is a red state (conservative), and therefore not too open to gay rights.

I 100% agree. Most of the people I know, including my parents and my girlfriend's father are against it, even some liberals oppose it here.
 
  • #15
Greg Bernhardt said:
Good news! NZ is on the right track!

It's good that New Zealand is being more progressive when it comes to human rights issues.

In terms of those that oppose homosexuals and homosexual marriage, or one or the other. I kind of get it (not in the sense of reasoning that they are opposing it). It's hard to be empathetic if you do not understand what it is like to be brandish constantly by negative connotations and bullied because of your orientation. Most of these individuals have had little to no worry of being ostracized because of who they are, so they don't know nor can they envision what it is like. Of course, there are those of us who can put ourselves outside of who we are and try to connect, empathize with those who are different using the powers of our consciousness. This is a basic human component of life, some have it, others seem to lack it.

Then again, there are those who don't necessarily lack that component and actually do care about people that are different, but because they have been brought up a certain way it would seem as though they would have to cut and burn those webs of negativity from their own lives.
 
  • #17
StevieTNZ said:
Gay marriage will be legal in NZ from tomorrow.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10913830

Congrats! Let me assure you the earthquakes have nothing at all to do with this :wink: :-p, although there is a certain "church" here that will tell you otherwise (**cough*westboro baptist*cough*).

We legalized gay marriage in my state (Washington) a few months ago, as it should be, IMO.
 
  • #18
Good for NZ, my gay friends will be pleased.
 
  • #19
jadair1 said:
I'm not gay
Why do you need to mention that?
 
  • #20
I_am_learning said:
Why do you need to mention that?

I'm not gay either. <shrug>
 
  • #21
I am, though, since the issue is, apparently, whether to mention it or not.<shrug>
 
  • #22
Make sure there is a distinction between "rights" and preferential treatment.
 
  • #23
HowlerMonkey said:
Make sure there is a distinction between "rights" and preferential treatment.
Which has been the case where civil unions between heterosexuals have entitled them to various legal and monetary benefits relative to similar homosexual couples.

For example, the spouse is given "next of kin" status, something that is important, for example. not only in terms of conferred inheritance rights, but also such delicate matters as the right to visit the person at the hospital.
 
  • #24
I_am_learning said:
Why do you need to mention that?

To show that it is not only gay's that can be in support of gay marriage.
 
  • #25
Evo said:
Florida is a red state (conservative), and therefore not too open to gay rights.

Evo, isn't it more accurate to refer to Florida as a "purple" state (i.e. neither truly conservative nor truly liberal), given the increasing proportion of Florida's population who move there from other areas of the US where more liberal views are commonplace?

(Of course, Florida also attracts a substantial number of immigrants, but I suspect that many immigrant communities may not be too open to gay rights either).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 350 ·
12
Replies
350
Views
30K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K